AI Rate Professor

English

Lance Mejia

ENGL1010 · ENGLISH60 · ENG60 · ENG060 · ENGL100 · ENGLISH100 · SUMMERENG103 · ENGLISH1010 · ENGLISH · ENGL060 · ENG100 · ENG103 · 20 lifetime ratings

AI rating
90/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

He is a strong pick if you want an engaging English class and are willing to write and participate.

Best fit · Effort For RewardFunny LecturerEngaging DiscussionsEssay BasedSupportiveSometimes Tough Grader
  • Most students describe him as funny, engaging, and enjoyable to learn from.
  • The class is usually manageable, but writing effort and .
  • Students who participate, attend, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

Many students find the class easy if they do the writing, but and A.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

74/100

The and discussion-based, though writing-heavy versions can be challenging.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

and participation matter, but they do not prove a .

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

Students strongly recommend him because he makes English lively, supportive, and manageable for students who try.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

as fair or easy, but several students call him a .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

66/100

The workload is mostly essays and writing, usually manageable but heavy in some summer or advanced sections.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Students repeatedly praise his humor, class discussions, support, and ability to make English engaging.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

15/100

Assessment appears heavily essay-based, with little evidence of .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

20 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are , and manageable essay-based work.

Main concern

A few students say assignment expectations or .

What students said

“Great teacher. Hes a very funny guy. His class is mostly discussions and they are very interesting.”
ENG100
“If you need help, he is there.”
ENG103
“But, . 93% is an A.”
SUMMERENG103

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews focus on essays and writing assignments, and they do not clearly .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam PolicyEssay-Based Assessment

Assessment risk

Varies

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and do not clearly prove any exam policy.

Essay-Based AssessmentReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy
“ remember.”
ENGL100
“5 five page papers and one 10 page research paper.”
ENG103
“The class is essay-based, so pay attention to the lectures.”
ENGL100

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He's the so far in College.”

Voice snapshots generated from 20 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, writing workload, and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“He's the so far in College.”

👍 Recommendation Level

90/100

“He was really great and ”

⚖️

58/100

“But, . 93% is an A.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Great teacher. Hes a very funny guy.
  • He made me feel so happy to be there He was fun and easy and talked openly
  • He's funny and keeps our lectures interesting.

Theme 2

📝 About Workload

  • A lot of writing involved, but he .
  • remember.
  • The class is essay-based, so pay attention to the lectures.

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Very easy and funny.
  • He is however a .
  • Gave me a B, exactly what i deserved.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

20

Recent reviews read by the AI

20

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 20 in-person reviews across several years are detailed and mostly consistent, with a few useful dissenting notes.

Inside 20 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 516
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG604 reviews
ENG1002 reviews
ENG1032 reviews
ENGL1002 reviews
ENGL10102 reviews
Show 7 more courses
ENGLISH1002 reviews
ENG0601 review
ENGL0601 review
ENGLISH1 review
ENGLISH10101 review
ENGLISH601 review
SUMMERENG1031 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values