AI Rate Professor

Horticulture

Steve Dugas

HORT161 · HORT177 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
75/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you want a and class engagement.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyPatient instructorApproachable after first impressionThorough lecturesStudy-focused
  • Students describe him as patient, nice, and willing to answer questions.
  • The course seems moderately difficult rather than effortless.
  • Evidence is positive but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Getting an A likely requires studying, since students praise him for helping those who actually study rather than calling the class easy.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online evidence.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The content appears moderate because both reviews rate difficulty around average and do not describe major conceptual barriers.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online comparison.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Reviews do not state an , but they emphasize learning through lectures and studying.

; there is no online evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

, and willingness to answer questions.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Reviews do not clearly describe grading leniency, so .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Students mention studying but .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss the course experience.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Students describe him as patient, helpful, and thorough in lectures.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews as the main assessment method.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and they do not specify assessment structure.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews describe a patient and .

Main concern

The limited review .

What students said

“He is more than happy to answer questions and LOVES it when people actually study.”
HORT161
“He has a lot of patience and goes over the material in class lectures pretty thoroughly.”
HORT177

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format or .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He has a lot of patience and goes over the material in class lectures pretty thoroughly.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and support. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“He has a lot of patience and goes over the material in class lectures pretty thoroughly.”

👍 Student Support

78/100

“He is more than happy to answer questions and LOVES it when people actually study.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He has a lot of patience and goes over the material in class lectures pretty thoroughly.
  • Steve is a good instructor.

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • Steve is a really great guy and although he seems .
  • He is more than happy to answer questions and LOVES it when people actually study.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only , though both are consistent and specific about teaching style.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

HORT1611 review
HORT1771 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values