AI Rate Professor

Art

Kirk Sivertsen

CARTN0000 · CARTO144 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
50/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.5

The decision

Consider him only if you are comfortable learning independently in a low-difficulty art class.

Best fit · Self Taught ProInconsistentEasy courseMixed helpfulnessLow structure
  • Only two reviews exist, and they directly conflict on teaching quality.
  • The class appears easy, but one student says classroom management and engagement were poor.
  • The evidence is too thin to make a confident recommendation.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Both reviews give very low difficulty, but there is .

All evidence comes from two in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Introductory

84/100

The difficulty ratings are very low, and no review describes the course content as intellectually hard.

Only in-person evidence exists, and both reviews suggest low difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

The , and there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Recommendation depends on which experience is more typical, because one review calls him excellent and another describes poor engagement.

All recommendation evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

75/100

Low difficulty ratings suggest lenient grading, but .

Format shift

, and grading is mostly inferred from difficulty ratings.

Workload

Light

82/100

The course appears light because both reviews rate difficulty very low and no one reports heavy work.

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

because one student says he was very helpful while another says he ignored students.

Format shift

Only two in-person reviews exist, and they conflict strongly.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not clearly describe whether .

Format shift

The .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

review and one complaint about poor attention to students.

Main concern

A student reports weak engagement and poor classroom control.

What students said

“He never paid attention to the students”
CARTO144
“ . Very helpful and informative.”
CARTN0000

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format or policy.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He never paid attention to the students”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting conflicting comments on teaching and classroom control; credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

52/100

“ . Very helpful and informative.”

⚠️ Classroom Experience

35/100

“He never paid attention to the students”

📉 Evidence Strength

35/100

“He never paid attention to the students”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He never paid attention to the students
  • . Very helpful and informative.

Theme 2

🏫 About Classroom Control

  • He didnt say anything to the extremely loud people in the back of the class talking and laughing their heads off
  • He would sit in the front or back of the class and play guitar

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

, and they are too contradictory for a stable judgment.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CARTN00001 review
CARTO1441 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values