AI Rate Professor

Biology

Harold Plett

BIO102 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
27/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Avoid him unless and and repetitive note-heavy lectures.

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing lecturesRandom gradingBoring notesQuiz errorsOccasional answer hints
  • Two of .
  • Students complain , and dismissive responses to questions.
  • One positive review says his energy fits a basic science course, but the overall tone is avoidant.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

An A may be possible when he gives hints, but as random and say you must be unusually aligned with his style to succeed.

All evidence comes from in-person BIO102 reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The biology content sounds standard, but , old material, and .

All .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

No online reviews exist, and policy.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Most reviewers advise against the class because of , and .

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

Students directly complain that , and dismissive even when errors are raised.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Reviews focus more on lectures, quizzes, exams, and .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and workload detail is limited.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

His energy is noted once, but most comments describe boring lectures, confusion, old material, and dismissive behavior.

Format shift

Teaching and is mostly negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

, and board notes more than homework or projects.

Format shift

Only in-person BIO102 reviews mention assessment.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews , and irrational grading.

Main concern

The main issue is unreliable teaching and .

What students said

“The .”
BIO102
“He grades randomly and illogically.”
BIO102
“This man has more energy and character than a lot of the college students he teaches.”
BIO102

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes and exams with errors and answer hints, but .

Quizzes MentionedExams MentionedErrors ReportedPolicy Not Clearly Proved

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and exams, but as open-book status or proctoring are not clearly proved.

Quizzes MentionedExams MentionedErrors Reported
“ and he wouldn't listen to anyone.”
BIO102
“he will basically .”
BIO102

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“But .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“He literally did nothing but write notes on the board.”

⚖️

20/100

“He grades randomly and illogically.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

28/100

“But .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lectures are immensely boring.
  • He writes stuff and goes through the book-what do you expect?
  • The .

Theme 2

📈 About Grades And Exams

  • and he wouldn't listen to anyone.
  • have as his students.
  • he will basically .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Concerns

  • He uses material that is 30 years old (or more).
  • he is irrational and dismisses questions.
  • You have to be as crazy as him to get an A.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Only , but two give detailed and consistent negative evidence about lectures and grading.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

BIO1023 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values