AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Levonne Nelson

PHIL160 · PHIL100HONORS · PHIL236 · PHILL100 · PHILANDLOGIC · PHILO · PHIL172 · PHIL195 · PHILPHIL · ETHICS · PHILOFETHICS · PHIL100172 · PHIL100 · PHIL160F · 45 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Take her if you can attend, read, and handle opinionated lectures, but if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardPassionate lecturerHard testsLecture dependentExtra creditMixed clarity
  • Students consistently say she is passionate and often helpful, but teaching clarity varies widely.
  • The course can be passable or even easy with , and .
  • because many students call them ambiguous, difficult, or lecture dependent.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Some students , and , but hard tests and reading demands keep it from being automatic.

All grade-effort evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

The content is often manageable, but philosophy readings, abstract discussion, and .

Only in-person reviews exist, so content difficulty is based entirely on that format.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

, but students repeatedly say lectures and notes are essential for quizzes and exams.

, and there is no online attendance evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

66/100

Many students recommend her for passion and helpfulness, but the and clarity make the recommendation conditional.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

because essays, study questions, and can offset hard tests.

Format shift

and grade recovery.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Workload , and tests, though some students report little homework.

Format shift

All and varies by course.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

She is often praised as passionate, knowledgeable, and helpful, but some students find her lectures rambling, biased, or unclear.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss teaching quality, with strongly mixed but mostly positive evidence.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

Grades appear to combine quizzes or , and occasional .

Format shift

, and study questions, with no online evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

45 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

many praise her passion and helpfulness, while many warn about hard or and occasional rambling lectures.

Main concern

and lecture dependent, so missing class or .

What students said

“Very interesting, but not an easy A”
PHIL160
“ .”
PHIL160
“As long as you show up and write what she does on the board you'll pass no problem.”
PHIL100

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is mixed, but the main risk is difficult or ambiguous , and .

Hard TestsAmbiguous QuestionsLecture Based QuizzesEssaysStudy GuidesExtra Credit

Assessment risk

Varies

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention hard or ambiguous tests, quizzes, essays, study guides, and , but .

Hard TestsAmbiguous QuestionsLecture Based QuizzesEssaysStudy GuidesExtra Credit
“ .”
PHIL160
“grade is based on 4 quizzes (30 ques. each) and a .”
PHIL160
“#exams;multiple chioce and .”
PHIL100HONORS
“5 Quizzes, 2 Essays, a few chances for .”
PHIL160

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Very interesting, but not an easy A”

Voice snapshots generated from 45 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“Nelson is super passionate about what .”

⚠️

42/100

“ .”

📈 Effort For Grade

62/100

“As long as you show up and write what she does on the board you'll pass no problem.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She obviously loves what she does.
  • Awesome teacher. Super helpful, and makes Phil. interesting.
  • and doesnt really say what you need to know.

Theme 2

📝

  • but her study guides are worth way more than the actual exams.
  • .
  • .

Theme 3

📚

  • You MUST read the book and .
  • Go to lectures, because 40% of what she says will be on the test.
  • Not a lot of homework, but reading and participating will help in the end.

Theme 4

⚖️ About Fit

  • Very interesting, but not an easy A
  • if you interested in philosophy with a light work load.
  • Please find another professor.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

45

Recent reviews read by the AI

45

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Forty-five in-person reviews across many years provide broad, detailed, and consistent patterns despite mixed opinions.

Inside 45 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 516
4 out of 512
3 out of 58
2 out of 58
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PHIL10015 reviews
PHIL16015 reviews
PHIL1722 reviews
PHIL1952 reviews
PHILL1002 reviews
Show 9 more courses
ETHICS1 review
PHIL1001721 review
PHIL100HONORS1 review
PHIL160F1 review
PHIL2361 review
PHILANDLOGIC1 review
PHILO1 review
PHILOFETHICS1 review
PHILPHIL1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values