AI Rate Professor

Interior Design

Barbara Keller

IDES120 · IDES150F · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
36/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Keller is risky because one course sounds manageable while .

Best fit · Effort For RewardHighly inconsistent experienceField trips helpExam preparation concernsHelpful in one courseAvoid warning
  • Student experience is sharply split, with one easy and helpful course review and one strongly negative review.
  • Getting an A may be possible in IDES120 with attendance and field trips, but IDES150F is described as poorly taught and exam-heavy.
  • The evidence base is very small and old, so conclusions are low confidence.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

One review reports getting an A despite missed class and , but another says the .

, and the two courses give conflicting grade signals.

Is the course easy?

Standard

46/100

One course sounds easy with field trips and attendance, while and poorly aligned with the exam.

Only in-person evidence exists, and course difficulty appears to vary by class.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

62/100

One review says missed classes and late work were tolerated, but field trips and 80 percent attendance mattered.

The only attendance evidence comes from one in-person IDES120 review.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

Recommendation depends heavily on the course because the .

All and is sharply mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

IDES120 appears forgiving, but IDES150F and preparation.

Format shift

All grading evidence .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Workload does not sound heavy, but , and a .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention workload, and detail is limited.

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

One student found Keller helpful, but another says the class taught nothing and ruined the subject for them.

Format shift

Teaching evidence is entirely in person and highly inconsistent.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

The clearest assessment , and one review centers on poor exam preparation.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews conflict strongly, with one student praising her helpfulness and another saying the class was damaging and .

Main concern

The biggest concern is inconsistent teaching quality across courses.

What students said

“She is a great teacher.”
IDES120
“ .”
IDES150F
“Even you read and study the book it does not preare for the exam.”
IDES150F

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention a final exam and , but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book status, or .

Final ExamExam Preparation Concerns

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and says studying the book did not prepare the student for the exam.

Final ExamExam Preparation Concerns
“ .”
IDES120
“Even you read and study the book it does not preare for the exam.”
IDES150F

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting the split between an easy helpful course and a ; credibility rating: Low.

⚖️ Mixed Experience

42/100

“She is a great teacher.”

📝

42/100

“Even you read and study the book it does not preare for the exam.”

👍 Grade Possibility

58/100

“got an A, even though I didn't show up for every class, and turned in .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very helpful, and answered any questions I had.
  • Horrible teacher . if possible.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • got an A, even though I didn't show up for every class, and turned in .
  • Even you read and study the book it does not preare for the exam.

Theme 3

🧭 About Course Structure

  • Learned more on field trips than in class.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only two old reviews exist, and they sharply conflict across different courses.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

IDES1201 review
IDES150F1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values