AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Gereld Gannon

MATH100 · MATH40 · MATH1032 · MATH20 · MATH15 · ALGEB20 · ALG100 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
47/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

some students thrive with his old-school style, but others feel unprepared and frustrated.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizing teacherEasy quizzesIrrelevant storiesStep-by-step when engagedUnclear test prep
  • Reviews are sharply split between students who found him caring and students who found him useless.
  • Some students describe an easy A , and generous quiz scores.
  • Negative reviews warn that lectures can wander and taught.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

64/100

An A can be reachable in some sections, but inconsistent teaching and .

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The math content can feel manageable with his step-by-step help but .

because there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

42/100

Reviews do not prove a , but one student says quiz credit was given just for showing up.

because there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

46/100

Recommendation depends heavily on whether his story-heavy, old-school style helps or distracts the student.

because there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

, but one review reports a grade dispute and others report hard or poorly covered quizzes.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

62/100

Workload does not sound heavy, with , but quizzes and .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

Teaching quality is polarizing, ranging from caring step-by-step explanations to irrelevant lectures and skipped steps.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

65/100

Reviews mention quizzes and tests more than assignments, but .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are polarized, with praise for and criticism of irrelevant lectures and .

Main concern

Lecture focus and .

What students said

“ and will repeat problems to help understand.”
MATH40
“If you want an A, !!!”
MATH20
“doesnt teach anything and lecturing on.”
MATH40

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes and tests but do not clearly prove open-book rules, proctoring, midterm format, or .

QuizzesTestsUnclear Coverage

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person evidence supports quizzes and tests with complaints about unclear coverage, but .

QuizzesTestsUnclear Coverage
“ ”
ALGEB20
“doesnt teach anything and lecturing on.”
MATH40
“ .”
MATH1032

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and will repeat problems to help understand.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and assessment alignment; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

52/100

“ and will repeat problems to help understand.”

👍 Recommendation Fit

46/100

“If you care about !”

📈 Grade Value

64/100

“If you want an A, !!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • very helpful and knows his stuff.
  • he skips steps so you'll never understand a problem.
  • He talks about unmath related crap

Theme 2

📈 About Grades and Effort

  • If you want an A, !!!
  • He gives out 10/10 quiz scores just for us showing up.
  • he ended up giving me a B allthough i had a straight A

Theme 3

🧪 About Quizzes and Tests

  • .
  • lecturing on.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

66/100

Evidence confidence

Eight older reviews provide useful but strongly conflicting , and assessment fit.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATH402 reviews
ALG1001 review
ALGEB201 review
MATH1001 review
MATH10321 review
Show 2 more courses
MATH151 review
MATH201 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values