AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Kari Richards-Dinger

M129 · MATH129 · MATH100 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
45/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you can handle uneven teaching and are comfortable learning some math independently.

Best fit · Self Taught ProMixed teaching qualityHelpful by emailSelf-teaching riskWord problemsNote-card tests
  • Reviews are sharply mixed, with some students finding her helpful and .
  • Math 100 appears more supportive and manageable than Math 129.
  • Students repeatedly complain about unclear explanations, poor class time use, and needing to teach themselves harder material.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Grades may be manageable in Math 100 with studying and note cards, but Math 129 reviews suggest unclear grading and self-teaching make A-level work less reliable.

All authoritative counts place the evidence in in-person reviews, even though one comment describes taking an online class.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Some students say the math becomes easy with support, but and word-heavy methods make the content harder for others.

All evidence is counted as .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Reviews mention in-class activities and homework but do .

In-person reviews suggest class participation can matter, but .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

Recommendation depends strongly on course and learning style because praise for helpfulness is offset by serious complaints about clarity and preparation.

All recommendation evidence is treated as .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

Note cards and manageable tests help some students, but and poor preparation concerns prevent calling it lenient.

Format shift

as in-person.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

and there are projects or activities, but some reviews say the workload is not excessive.

Format shift

All workload evidence is from reviews counted as in-person.

Teaching experience

Average

45/100

Teaching quality is inconsistent, with helpful support in some reviews and strong criticism of clarity, preparation, and class time use in others.

Format shift

All teaching evidence is treated as in-person based on authoritative counts.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews , and a cumulative final, so assessment is mixed rather than exam-only.

Format shift

All assessment evidence is counted as in-person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

helpfulness in Math 100 but serious concerns about clarity, preparation, and self-teaching in Math 129.

Main concern

The biggest risk is unclear teaching that leaves students learning difficult material on their own.

What students said

“you have to teach yourself the material when you come across it in the homework.”
MATH129
“ .”
MATH100

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

but standard overall, with one note-card allowance offset by a .

Note Card AllowedCumulative FinalNo Review Clearly Provided

Assessment risk

Standard

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

tests and a cumulative final, but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, open-book, or closed-book rules.

Note Card AllowedCumulative FinalNo Review Clearly Provided
“ of info.”
MATH100
“ and she doe not provide a review.”
MATH129

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She leaves the difficult methods out of her lecture so that you have to teach yourself the material when you come across it in the homework.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

45/100

“the way she explained everything was all over the place.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

42/100

“ ”

📝 Assessment Style

60/100

“ of info.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She makes math easy and FUN.
  • doesnt know how to use a calculator.. WHAT!?
  • She doesn't use class time wisely.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy if you study and
  • the way she grade?dont know
  • I got a D in her class but got an A+ with cindy zarske's hybrid online class?

Theme 3

🧮 About Course Fit

  • She has in-class activity sheets that you do in groups that helps you understand what you just learned that day.
  • she is all about WORD PROBLEMS.
  • you have to teach yourself the material when you come across it in the homework.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Eight older reviews provide concrete but conflicting evidence, with course differences making the overall picture uneven.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 53
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH1005 reviews
MATH1292 reviews
M1291 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values