AI Rate Professor

English

Paul Fitzjarrald

ENGL60 · ENG60 · LBST300 · ENGL100 · ENG100 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
80/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you want a and can handle high expectations.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerDeep discussionsChallenging writingIntellectual styleHelpful feedbackCan seem rude
  • Students , and ability to improve writing and thinking.
  • The class demands participation, mature engagement, and .
  • Some students find him rude, monotone, or hard to relate to, so fit matters.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

An A seems possible with , and strong papers, but it is not a low-effort grade.

All .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

38/100

The course requires deep discussion, serious thinking, and .

Only in-person reviews describe course challenge.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

as mandatory, but comments say attending and participating are important for success.

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

, but not for students seeking a relaxed or highly personable instructor.

but include repeated concerns about tone and classroom fit.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

He requires strong papers and serious effort, but students describe the work as challenging rather than impossible.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

, and thorough papers, which require steady effort.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention workload.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Most students praise his knowledge, depth, and helpfulness, while a minority criticize his tone and lecture style.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Reviews emphasize papers, writing, discussion, and assigned material, with .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

but rewarding instructor who pushes deep thinking and strong writing, though some students dislike his tone.

Main concern

Students who want an easy or relaxed English class may find him too demanding or abrasive.

What students said

“The work is challenging, but not impossible.”
ENG100
“he's so rude. treats his students as if they are in h.s./junior high.”
ENG100

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, midterm format, or .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and discussions but do not clearly prove any exam policy.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This teacher had a great impact on my life. He taught me how to be a better writer, thinker, and student.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, rigor, writing, and classroom fit. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“ .”

📚 Course Challenge

38/100

“The work is challenging, but not impossible.”

⚖️ Student Fit

76/100

“ just out of high school students.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • keeps students enthused and participating.
  • he was horrible. Not a good wake up call, very monitone, lectures went on forever

Theme 2

✍️ About Writing And Work

  • He requires a , but gave you good directions and brainstorms in class
  • The work is challenging, but not impossible.

Theme 3

❤️ About Personality Fit

  • Interesting class but I found him to be sort of rude.
  • he's so rude. treats his students as if they are in h.s./junior high.
  • If you act like an adult, you will be treated like one.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven in-person reviews over several years provide , and personality fit.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 52
3 out of 53
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG1006 reviews
ENGL1002 reviews
ENG601 review
ENGL601 review
LBST3001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values