AI Rate Professor

Anthropology

Carolyn Coffman

ANTH102 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
72/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

She looks worthwhile if and can study seriously for harder tests.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear teacherInteresting classHard testsStudy-heavy final
  • The single review describes her as a clear and very good teacher.
  • Tests and the as hard and requiring a lot of study.
  • The class is made more engaging through interesting material and videos.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

The , but the and require substantial studying.

All evidence comes from one in-person review, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

The class sounds understandable and interesting, but exams and study load keep it from being easy.

, so format comparison is not possible.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review does not clearly .

The only evidence is one in-person review, and .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

The reviewer recommends the teaching quality because and makes the class interesting despite harder tests.

Recommendation evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

The review mentions hard tests but .

Format shift

Only one in-person review .

Workload

Moderate

45/100

The class requires a lot of studying, especially for tests and the final.

Format shift

All workload .

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

The reviewer , and able to make the class interesting.

Format shift

Teaching evidence .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

The only assessment evidence centers on tests and the final.

Format shift

Only the in-person review mentions assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The and an interesting class but warns that tests and the .

Main concern

The main concern is the amount of studying needed for tests and the final.

What students said

“ but .”
ANTH102
“Class is and you'll watch fun videos”
ANTH102

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The review says tests and the final are hard, but it does .

Hard TestsHard FinalLot To Study

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The and a hard final with a lot to study, without clear policy details.

Hard TestsHard FinalLot To Study
“ but .”
ANTH102

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Very Good teacher. Phd.Proffesor. but .”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“Class is and you'll watch fun videos”

📚 Study Load

45/100

“ but .”

👍 Recommendation Level

78/100

“Very Good teacher.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very Good teacher.
  • Class is and you'll watch fun videos

Theme 2

📈

  • but .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

, so the analysis is useful but weak and may not represent the broader class experience.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ANTH1021 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values