AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Lewis Cole

ACCT107 · ACCT101B · ACCT101 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
8/100
RMP rating
1.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

unless you can teach yourself accounting and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing lecturesHarsh testsHeavy homeworkLow supportAvoid if busy
  • Most students , and little help with questions.
  • Tests are viewed as harsh, cumulative, and often unsupported by reviews or study guides.
  • One review says an A , but the dominant experience is difficult and frustrating.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

One student says doing homework can lead to an A, but , and heavy work that make high grades costly.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The accounting content may be manageable for prepared students, but and .

All course difficulty evidence comes from in-person ACCT101 and ACCT101B reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

as mandatory, but one review says attending helps with .

, and they suggest it is useful rather than clearly required.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Students overwhelmingly advise avoiding him because , and support is weak.

All , and the tone is strongly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

10/100

Students mention trick questions, no curve, no notes, and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Reviews repeatedly mention a lot of homework and .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Most students describe him as , and dependent on the textbook or .

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Comments , and difficult test formats.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are overwhelmingly negative, , and little help.

Main concern

Students repeatedly say they had to rely on the book or tutor instead of the professor.

What students said

“Bad teacher! He can't answer any questions without the from his teacher's edition.”
ACCT101B
“ . He is terrible at explaining.”
ACCT101B
“No books, no notes, absolutely nothing is allowed in his tests.”
ACCT101B

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe strict in-person exams with no notes, little review support, and .

No Notes AllowedCumulative FinalMidtermNo ReviewsNo Study GuidesNo Curve

Assessment risk

Strict

12/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, no notes, no reviews, and no curve.

No Notes AllowedCumulative FinalMidtermNo ReviewsNo Curve
“ and .”
ACCT101B
“No books, no notes, absolutely nothing is allowed in his tests.”
ACCT101B
“ .”
ACCT101B

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . He is terrible at explaining.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting repeated themes in teaching, exams, and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

12/100

“He has no teaching skills.”

⚖️

10/100

“ .”

🚫 Recommendation Risk

8/100

“Avoid!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures are rubbish but attending will give you a .
  • !
  • He is terrible at explaining.

Theme 2

📝 About Tests

  • and .
  • No books, no notes, absolutely nothing is allowed in his tests.
  • The .

Theme 3

📚 About Workload and Support

  • He is strict and requires a lot of .
  • There's No reviews, No study guides, .
  • You can only count in the book and tutoring.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Seven detailed in-person reviews across several years are highly consistent in describing poor teaching and , though the reviews are old.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 55

Course coverage

ACCT101B5 reviews
ACCT1011 review
ACCT1071 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values