AI Rate Professor

History

James James

Courses not reported · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
19/100
RMP rating
1.3/5
Take again
20%
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

unless you are comfortable with high difficulty, participation pressure, and inconsistent support.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderParticipation MattersTest HeavyMany PapersPoor Communication
  • Most reviews strongly advise against taking him, .
  • In-person students repeatedly describe high difficulty, , and papers.
  • The and no response to a .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

One student earned an A, but most comments describe , and grade dissatisfaction.

In person evidence is much harsher, while the single and poor response.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

The course appears intellectually and practically , and participation-focused expectations.

In person reviews provide the strongest evidence of high difficulty, while the Online review gives limited difficulty detail.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Repeated participation-matters tags suggest class presence or engagement is important, though .

Participation concerns come from In person reviews, with .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Most students directly warn against taking him because of , and weak communication.

In person reviews are mostly strongly negative, and the single Online review is also negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

Multiple tough-grader tags and .

Format shift

, while Online evidence shows grade dissatisfaction.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Comments and tags point to many papers, test-heavy structure, lecture-heavy classes, and participation demands.

Format shift

Workload concerns come mostly from In person reviews, with little Online workload detail.

Teaching experience

Awful

22/100

Most reviews are very negative and include direct warnings, though .

Format shift

In person feedback is polarized but mostly negative, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

75/100

The class appears test-heavy with papers and participation also contributing to assessment pressure.

Format shift

In person reviews mention tests, papers, and participation, while Online evidence focuses on an assignment and grade issue.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mostly negative, citing , and very high difficulty.

Main concern

Students repeatedly warn against taking him because the class feels harsh and demanding.

What students said

“ !!!”
2301019
“Please don't pick him.”
10345236

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online review reports confusing assignment directions, grade frustration, and .

Main concern

Communication and .

What students said

“I emailed him about my grade which I think was lower than expected and he never responded.”
2301019

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention test-heavy assessment but do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or closed-book rules.

Test HeavyPapersParticipation

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person reviews mention test-heavy classes but do not clearly prove the .

Test Heavy
“really really bad...”
10345236

Online

The Online review does not clearly prove exam policy, proctoring, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and communication. Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Recommendation Risk

25/100

“Please don't pick him.”

⚖️

20/100

“I emailed him about my grade which I think was lower than expected and he never responded.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

22/100

“really really bad...”

Theme 1

🚫 About Recommendations

  • !!!
  • Please don't pick him.
  • Pretty great professor, not as bad as everybody makes him seem!

Theme 2

⚖️ About Grades And Work

  • I emailed him about my grade which I think was lower than expected and he never responded.
  • really really bad...
  • Professor Ivy syllabus stated that an but directions in syllabus stated that it was and when I corrected and instead called out another flaw in the assignment.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because five recent reviews show a strong negative pattern, but several comments are short and one review is sharply positive.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

103452363 reviews
23010192 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2