AI Rate Professor

History

Noaquia Banks

HIST11 · HIST27B · HIST27A · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
36.36%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

Avoid unless you need the class and can self-manage tight deadlines with .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderSlow FeedbackPoor Online CommunicationTight Weekly WindowsPassionate In Person
  • Online students frequently , and awkward Tuesday-to-Friday deadlines.
  • A few students still praise passionate lectures and .
  • , but sample size is tiny and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

36/100

Some earn As, but tough grading, picky final rules, and .

; limited in-person evidence is milder.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Material is often called repetitive or straightforward, yet volume, reading, and .

Online calls work easy but tedious; .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

42/100

while others say no; comments do not show a single flexible policy.

Online and in-person both mix mandatory and non-mandatory reports.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

34/100

Take-again is about 36%, and many online comments actively steer students away despite a few strong fans.

Online drives the ; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Tough grader tag is common, with and .

Format shift

Strictness is clearest online; .

Workload

Moderate

48/100

, but , and tight open windows create pressure.

Format shift

Online feels tedious with short windows; in-person workload sounds lighter.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Lectures can be strong and passionate, but and weak communication drag the overall experience.

Format shift

In-person teaching praise is higher; online experience is weaker.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

Mix of weekly assignments, primary-source work, video reviews, quizzes, and a .

Format shift

Online emphasizes essays and weekly turn-ins; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Two in-person reviews are more positive about passion, straightforward work, and , though still mark her as a .

Main concern

; .

What students said

“she's passionate on what she teaches which got me excited to go learn”
HIST11
“the class was not too hard.”
HIST11

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

content can be simple but , and communication is often poor.

Main concern

, and short assignment windows.

What students said

“ . It's easy but she's extremely difficult and a terrible terrible communicator.”
HIST27A
“ . Doesn't honor her syllabus and .”
HIST27A
“40/100 on final because I didn't see that we can't use outside sources.”
HIST11

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessments combine weekly written work with a and occasional quizzes rather than clearly student-friendly exams.

Final essay with TurnitinNo outside sources on finalCanvas testsPop quizzes mentionedPrimary source reviews

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and straightforward work, without detailed proctoring claims.

Canvas testsFlexible test timing
“we were allowed to take tests on our own times ”
HIST11

Online

Online reviews emphasize tough written finals, Turnitin, primary-source grading, and .

Turnitin final essayNo outside sourcesPrimary source reviewsPop quizzes
“also uses turnitin for the ”
HIST11
“40/100 on final because I didn't see that we can't use outside sources.”
HIST11

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . It's easy but she's extremely difficult and a terrible terrible communicator.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, , and format split. Credibility rating: Medium.

⚖️

28/100

“Points were taken off of an improve.”

📬 Communication

30/100

“If you have questions don't even bother asking”

🔥 In-Person Passion

70/100

“she's passionate on what she teaches which got me excited to go learn”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • simple
  • She gave detailed lectures,
  • extremely boring,just writing about what we learned back in middle school.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • she will grade tough on primary sources and video reviews.
  • The work is easy, yet tedious because there is a lot.
  • so hard to tell where you stand

Theme 3

⏱️ About Deadlines & Access

  • in on fridays
  • and are due every Friday.
  • Prepare to wait centuries for though.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven reviews give a usable but small sample, mostly online, with mixed detail and some polarization.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 53
1 out of 52

Course coverage

HIST27A5 reviews
HIST114 reviews
HIST27B2 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 2 · A 2

B range

2

B 2

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 3