AI Rate Professor

Science

Hancock Nigel

ENVR1 · ENVRS1 · ENVRSD314 · PHYGE1 · 43 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
21.95%
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

Avoid unless and can handle long lectures and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderLecture heavyCheating accusationsProctored examsLong lecture videos
  • and constant cheating accusations.
  • , and heavy weekly load.
  • A if and want deep content.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

15/100

Many F, D, C, and drops; students say and .

Online is worse for As; rare As appear mainly when students grind hybrid or in person.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

18/100

Multi-hour lectures, trick questions, and .

Both formats are hard; online adds video volume and proctoring stress.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Missing class ; skip and you will not pass is a common tag.

In ; online is less seat-based but still rigid deadlines.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Only about 22% would take again; dominant message is run and .

Online recommendation is near zero; in person has a small passionate minority.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

; surprise/trick questions and .

Format shift

and accusations; in person still strict.

Workload

Overwhelming

15/100

Hours of , and multiple proctored exams pile up.

Format shift

Online workload is especially crushing; in person is lecture and .

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

A few praise passion and lectures, but most describe rudeness, boredom, and unhelpful communication.

Format shift

In-person hybrid fans exist; online teaching experience is widely awful.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

85/100

, and few high-stakes papers.

Format shift

Both formats test-heavy; and speed penalties.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

22 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In person is slightly better for a few who enjoy passionate lectures, but many still call him boring, strict, and hard.

Main concern

, and little Canvas organization.

What students said

“ . He is an amazing lecturer who is passionate about the subject.”
ENVRS1
“This is by far the while being at LBCC.”
ENVR1
“RUN! There's no tutoring for his class so that sucks!”
ENVRS1

Remote format

Online

23 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online ENVRS/ENVR is widely called a nightmare: , and cheating accusations.

Main concern

, and zero leniency crush full-time students.

What students said

“ so if you don't want to feel watched and have no privacy during an !”
ENVR1
“ ! Professor is rude, constantly accuses the class of cheating.”
ENVRS1
“Lecture videos are EXTREMELY LONG. Youre assigned at least 6-9 20-35+ min videos a week + note taking.”
ENVR1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, often no study guide, and accused cheating culture.

Proctored examsLockdown BrowserTrick questionsNo study guides oftenCamera recording

Assessment risk

Strict

18/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person quizzes and and ; less software detail but still strict.

Pop quizzesLecture-based testsTough gradingExtra credit sometimes
“Puts and admits it later, but .”
ENVRS1
“make sure you write everything down because what he says will all be questions on the test.”
ENVRS1

Online

Online exams use Lockdown/proctoring and camera; students report and constant cheating accusations.

Lockdown BrowserProctored examsCamera onTrick questionsNo exam review
“ so if you don't want to feel watched and have no privacy during an !”
ENVR1
“ and he accuses you of cheating even though you're on camera.”
ENVRS1
“He also makes you download spyware in and SSN!!)”
ENVR1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ! He teaches extremely outdated and he is very passive aggressive I'm surprised he has never been reported.”

Voice snapshots generated from 45 reviews, , and . Credibility rating: High.

🚨

22/100

“RUN! There's no tutoring for his class so that sucks! I wasted my time and effort in this class”

📷 Strict Proctoring

18/100

“ so if you don't want to feel watched and have no privacy during an !”

⚖️

12/100

“He's a .”

📚 Overwhelming Lectures

15/100

“Lecture videos are EXTREMELY LONG. Youre assigned at least 6-9 20-35+ min videos a week + note taking.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is an amazing lecturer who is passionate about the subject
  • Rambles aimlessly throughout lecture
  • lectures are incredibly long and drawn out

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • ONLY A FEW STUDENTS GET A !
  • grades super hard.Horrible
  • Not a single student has an "A" or "B" grade.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Climate & Fairness

  • constantly accuses the class of cheating
  • Pretty sure he wants people to fail
  • just a really unpleasant man.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

45

Recent reviews read by the AI

43

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

45 reviews over many years with highly , and workload.

Inside 45 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 56
3 out of 52
2 out of 54
1 out of 529

Course coverage

ENVR121 reviews
ENVRS120 reviews
ENVRSD3142 reviews
PHYGE12 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

31 reported outcomes

A range

5

A 5

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 1 · B- 1

C range

6

C+ 2 · C 3 · C- 1

D range

1

D- 1

F

5

F 5

No letter grade reported

11

Drop/Withdrawal 9 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1