AI Rate Professor

Ethnic Studies

Erika Santizo

Courses not reported · 18 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
38.89%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Avoid if you have another option; if you can attend every class and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerLate grading no feedbackStrict and polarizingAttendance locked workHeavy reading and videosRudeness complaints common
  • Reviews are sharply split, with more low scores and .
  • Biggest , and harsh tone.
  • Showing up and grinding the some.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Some students earn As by attending and complying, but , and .

Online outcomes look harsher; in person has more A reports but still many grade frustrations.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is often called easy, but volume of , and strict logistics raise the real difficulty.

Both formats call the material manageable while criticizing process and workload.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

and penalties for lateness or absence.

In person is especially attendance-locked; some .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

34/100

and frequent do-not-recommend comments outweigh a smaller set of strong fans.

; in-person opinions are split but still risky.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Tough-grader tags, point deductions, and little recovery after late or .

Format shift

; a few in-person students still call her flexible.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

, and presentations create a draining load.

Format shift

Online students emphasize long videos and repetitive writing; in person adds in-class assignments.

Teaching experience

Poor

36/100

Supporters find her honest and eye-opening, but many describe rudeness, tangents, disorganization, and .

Format shift

In-person praise exists; online teaching experience is largely negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

Grades run on , and in-class work more than classic exams.

Format shift

Both formats are assignment heavy; in person includes more participation and group presentation work.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

supporters say show up, do the work, and you will be fine, while critics slam late grades, tangents, and strict classroom rules.

Main concern

to recover from mistakes.

What students said

“This class is very easy if you keep an open mind and are willing to learn.”
31568
“ and .”
71696
“Assignments are graded way late after submission so any chance of correcting or .”
71696

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews are mostly negative, citing rude communication, unclear or , and little flexibility.

Main concern

Workload and several D, F, or drop outcomes reported.

What students said

“the communication style often comes across as rude or dismissive”
31568
“She is a and .”
71696
“It was so draining having to watch 30-minute to even 3-hour-long videos and answer 5 questions on them”
71696

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is assignment-driven with papers and presentations; reviews do not clearly prove webcam proctoring.

In-class assignmentsWeekly readingsVideo quizzesMidterm paperGroup presentation final

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person work , and group presentations; closed-book exam security is not clearly proven.

In-class only assignmentsMidterm paperFinal group presentationMandatory attendance
“ be accessed online.”
31568
“ as well as in class assignments, mid term paper and .”
71696

Online

Online students describe repetitive , and research presentations rather than clear proctored exams.

Repetitive weekly writingLong video quizzesResearch presentation finalLate grade changes
“The of research.”
71696
“watch 30-minute to even 3-hour-long videos and answer 5 questions on them”
71696

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Would not recommend. and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 18 reviews with a strong negative majority and a . Credibility rating: High.

🐢 Late Grades Kill Recovery

28/100

“Assignments are graded way late after submission so any chance of correcting or .”

🚫 Polarizing Classroom Climate

36/100

“the communication style often comes across as rude or dismissive, which makes it hard to feel comfortable in the class.”

✅ Show Up Crowd Still Exists

70/100

“Just show up, do your work, and you will do fine.”

Theme 1

📉

  • and
  • She is a and
  • . I did not

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • Get ready to read
  • Hour long videos just to answer a few questions online
  • If you're willing to spend hours writing and reading for 4 points every week

Theme 3

⚖️ Split Student Takes

  • Professor Santizo really is an amazing instructor
  • I would never have taken this course if
  • Don't use AI, do your work, submit your work on time, and you'll have NO issues

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

18

Recent reviews read by the AI

18

Lifetime ratings

80/100

Evidence confidence

Eighteen detailed recent reviews with and tone, plus a visible positive minority, yield high credibility.

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 510

Course coverage

7169612 reviews
315686 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

18 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 1 · A 7

B range

5

B+ 1 · B 4

C range

0

No reported values

D range

2

D+ 1 · D 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 2