AI Rate Professor

Political Science

Angela Cranon-Charles

POLISCI1 · POLSCI1 · POLSC1 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
53.85%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you will read every module carefully and double-check grades; otherwise the .

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough graderPolarizing Canvas courseHeavy readingDiscussion-focusedUnclear grade math
  • Reviews split hard between caring helpful instructor and .
  • , and careful Canvas tracking.
  • Some students report grade surprises and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

, and discussion posts are graded harshly.

Online shows the sharpest grade-surprise complaints; in .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Intro political science , and participation demands.

; online is more self-guided.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

40/100

as required and warn that skipping hurts.

In person and some online sections both emphasize participation requirements.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

; supporters cite help and structure while .

Online opinions are more polarized than in person.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

, and final grades below Canvas averages appear repeatedly.

Format shift

; in person also tags tough grader.

Workload

Heavy

38/100

Lots of reading, discussion posts, group projects, and module work fill the term.

Format shift

Both formats mention reading and .

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

and encouragement for some, condescending tone and messy organization for others.

Format shift

Praise and and in-person sets.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Discussions, modules, group work, and participation carry more weight than classic sit-down exams in student comments.

Format shift

across formats.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person sections still demand reading, participation, and group work, with praise for lectures and critiques of university-level rigor and .

Main concern

and a dense Canvas setup frustrate students seeking a light intro course.

What students said

“Bro this is a Junior college level course and she's makes it seem likes its uni level like be serious professor.”
POLISCI1
“I enjoyed the lectures and debates that were had every now and then.”
POLSC1
“She is an .”
POLSCI1

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online POLSC/POLISCI1 is module-heavy with readings, discussions, and mixed reports of and condescension.

Main concern

and TurnItIn discussion scrutiny create high stress.

What students said

“Online course .”
POLSC1
“ !! Horrible. I was given a B after my canvas grade was a 96.”
POLISCI1
“She marked several of my assignments as zeros and claimed I did not participate when all the proof I did is literally online.”
POLSC1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Students mention study guides and module work more than a , so .

Study GuidesDiscussion PostsModule BasedTurnItIn Discussions

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments emphasize discussions, lectures, and policy.

Discussion PostsLecture and DebateTough Discussion Grading
“She is an .”
POLSCI1
“I enjoyed the lectures and debates that were had every now and then.”
POLSC1
“she's makes it seem likes its uni level”
POLISCI1

Online

Online evidence centers on modules, discussions, and study guides rather than a .

Study GuidesModule AssignmentsTurnItIn Discussions
“ .”
POLSC1
“she uses TurnItIn's familiarity reports for the discussions!”
POLISCI1
“ .”
POLSC1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !! Horrible. I was given a B after my canvas grade was a 96.”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 polarized reviews, contrasting grading disputes with . Credibility rating: Medium.

⚖️

32/100

“ !! Horrible. I was given a B after my canvas grade was a 96.”

🎯 Teaching Support

48/100

“The professor answered all of my emails, helped me with .”

📚 Reading Load

38/100

“ if you're not willing to spend the time and dedication for your grade your action will be reflected on with your grade.”

🚫

30/100

“ .”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • !! Horrible.
  • She is an .
  • Course can be a breeze if you just follow the basic guidelines.

Theme 2

💻 About Course Design

  • There lied the .
  • Whole course is from an online textbook.
  • .

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • her approachability and helpfulness make her a sought-after instructor.
  • She has a very condescending attitude
  • Professor Cranon's dedication earns high recommendation.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Thirteen detailed and polarized reviews across online and in person are useful but still a modest sample with sharp opinion swings.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 55

Course coverage

POLSC19 reviews
POLISCI13 reviews
POLSCI11 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 2 · A 1

B range

6

B+ 1 · B 4 · B- 1

C range

2

C+ 1 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Rather not say 1