Sequare Daniel-Berhe

CS153 · STAT1H · MATH825 · MATH120 · ENGR3A · MATH60 · BCALC · STAT1 · MATH110 · MATH47 · ECE442L · MATH140 · MATH50 · CBIS141 · MATH45 · 103 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 36/100
RMP rating: 2.6/5
Take again: 36.73%
Difficulty: 3.3

The decision

if you can self-study math, tolerate a tough classroom style, and will use all ; otherwise pick another professor.

Best fit · Effort For RewardLecture Heavy Slide ReaderPolarizing PersonalityHomework AvalancheExtra Credit LifelineMandatory Participation

; many call him rude, unclear, and unhelpful.
Expect , and lectures that often rehash the textbook or slides.
An A is possible if , and use every opportunity.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

and formula sheets can rescue a grade, but , and picky grading still require real work for an A.

Both online and and effort; online also stresses participation points.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

, and abstract math/stats content make the material intellectually demanding for many students.

In-person reviews more often call pace and accent barriers hard; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Attendance is repeatedly marked mandatory, participation is graded, and skip-class warnings are common.

Evidence is mostly in-person mandatory rules; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

37/100

Would-take-again sits near 37% with frequent worst-professor warnings outweighing the minority of glowing success stories.

A few strong online STAT1 fans exist, but the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Tough on exams and , yet abundant and occasional formula sheets keep many students passing.

Format shift

and generous ; online similarly praises extra credit.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students report 20-plus problem sets, constant homework, and .

Format shift

Heavy workload appears in both formats, with .

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

A minority finds him caring and clear, but , and condescending replies to questions.

Format shift

Online reviews are slightly warmer on average; .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

and participation with midterms, chapter tests, and high-stakes finals.

Format shift

In-person STAT and ; online also relies on quizzes and finals.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

47 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

supporters praise care and , critics report slide-reading, thick accent, condescension, and .

Main concern

Many students say lectures add little and the tone can feel demeaning when you ask questions.

What students said

“Do not sleep on this professor. He actually wants you to learn the subject and will go out of his way to make you understand.”
MATH50

“He only reads through the textbook and expects us to know everything about the material, very rude to his students.”
MATH47

“Prepare to teach yourself the entire class, you'll barely be able to understand what this professor says.”
STAT1

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online sections still demand participation and textbook-style lectures, with and useful if you stay engaged.

Main concern

Cold-calling and participation deductions can punish quiet or asynchronous students.

What students said

“It's simple, go to class, participate, do the , and study the quizzes for the . He gives A LOT of .”
STAT1

“This class is basically him telling you what's already in your textbook. He always calls on people, and if you don't respond/don't have the .”
MATH825

“Attend lectures, do the work, and use tools like unstuck AI to supplement your study - it really helped me prepare for the .”
STAT1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are frequent and material-heavy, sometimes softened by formula sheets and .

Chapter TestsFormula Sheet AllowedTest HeavyExtra CreditParticipation Points

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; some courses allow a formula page, and finals can weight single questions heavily.

In-Person ExamsFormula PageTest HeavyPop Quizzes

“He allows you to have a full page of formulas for exams and he wants you to succeed!”
MATH45

“The final's last question was worth 20% !?!?”
STAT1

“Beware of ”
STAT1

Online

and quizzes, with heavy participation expectations.

Quizzes Feed FinalParticipation RequiredExtra Credit

“study the . He gives A LOT of .”
STAT1

“use tools like unstuck AI to supplement your study - it really helped me prepare for the .”
STAT1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“If you put in the work, I guarantee you'll pass the class. If you don't understand something the professor will go over it with you... He's a good professor.”
Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting polarization in teaching, workload, and ; Credibility rating: High.

📉 Polarized Teaching

38/100

“Reads directly from the textbook. Doesn't teach anything. Does not listen/answer questions.”

📚

28/100

“he would assign 25 problems that .”

🎁 Safety Net

52/100

“I literally had an F in the class, but he let me do and got my grade up to pass.”

🚫 Low Recommendation

37/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

.
His lectures are outdated and irrelevant to engineering.
He does give a lot of homework but its only practice for the .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

If you put in the work, I guarantee you'll pass the class.
Gives so much , it's impossible not to pass this course.
Everyone failed the second test and he doesn't care.

Theme 3

😤 About Classroom Tone

Condescending attitude only his way is right
He always says you are not my student if you don't know the answer.
He is extremely rude and disrespectful and talks to his students like we are literal kindergarteners.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

103

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty detailed reviews spanning 2016-2026 with consistent themes of , and polarizing demeanor support high confidence.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 525

4 out of 515

3 out of 57

2 out of 512

1 out of 545

Course coverage

STAT122 reviews

MATH454 reviews

MATH474 reviews

MATH503 reviews

STAT1H3 reviews

Show 11 more courses

CBIS1412 reviews

ENGR3A2 reviews

MATH602 reviews

706261 review

BCALC1 review

CS1531 review

ECE442L1 review

MATH1101 review

MATH1201 review

MATH1401 review

MATH8251 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

40 reported outcomes

A range

A+ 2 · A 8

B range

B+ 5 · B 5 · B- 3

C range

C 2

D range

D- 1

F

F 1

No letter grade reported

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 9 · Rather not say 1

Sequare Daniel-Berhe

x x x if you can self-study math, tolerate a tough classroom style, and will use all x x; otherwise pick another professor.

Four answers before you build your schedule.

FairEffort

Challenging

Mandatory

Avoid

See how this professor fits your week.

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

In person

Online

See what students actually said.

📉 Polarized Teaching

📚 x x

🎁 x x Safety Net

🚫 Low Recommendation

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

😤 About Classroom Tone

See exactly what the AI read.

Quality ratings

Course coverage

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

A range

B range

C range

D range

F

No letter grade reported

if you can self-study math, tolerate a tough classroom style, and will use all ; otherwise pick another professor.

📚

🎁 Safety Net