AI Rate Professor

History

Milo Alvarez

ETHST1 · HIST18 · HIS8B · HIST8BH · HIST8A · HIST10 · 45 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
24.44%
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

Avoid unless you are a strong independent writer ready for and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHarsh Essay GraderAI Detection StrictUnclear RubricsHeavy Reading LoadHigh-Stakes Few Assignments
  • Many students report , and automatic zeros for outside sources or suspected AI.
  • Grades hinge on a and videos.
  • A minority who seek office hours or thrived , but most advise avoiding.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

Many A students report Ds and unattainable.

Online reviews ; a few in-person success stories required heavy intervention.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Dense readings, long videos, and and time burden.

; online adds self-teaching from modules and documentaries.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

and many online courses having no live attendance.

; in-person mixed between mandatory and optional.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

24/100

and comments overwhelmingly warn students away despite scattered positive outliers.

; in-person has a slightly higher share of mixed or positive notes.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

Students report zeros for outside sources, vague rubrics, AI accusations, and .

Format shift

and appears frequently in person too.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Weekly multi-source readings, long videos, and .

Format shift

Online students especially cite 100+ pages and multi-hour videos per week.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Common critiques include little real teaching, documentaries instead of lectures, and rude communication.

Format shift

Online teaching critiques are harshest; a few in-person and honors students found lectures valuable.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Grades rest on a handful of essays and .

Format shift

Both formats emphasize few high-weight essays; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

with weak live teaching, though a few credit office hours for turnarounds.

Main concern

Unclear instructions and .

What students said

“ ... He is a and takes a long time to return assignments.”
ETHST1
“I went to his office hours for help. He told me exactly what I needed to change for the next essay.”
HIST8A

Remote format

Online

37 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online sections dominate complaints about harsh AI checks, sparse teaching via videos, and .

Main concern

, and zero-tolerance source rules make failure risk high.

What students said

“This guy uses Ai to check for Ai use, make it make sense. The .”
ETHST1
“Do yourself a favor and stay away from him.”
ETHST1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is writing-centric with strict source and AI rules rather than traditional proctored exams.

Essay-HeavyDiscussion PostsAI DetectionNo Outside SourcesDrop Lowest Essay

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments focus on essays and .

Essay FocusAnnotation Assignments
“assigning annotation work by asking students to highlight what seems important to them, but been highlighted.”
ETHST1

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam proctoring; they stress essays, AI checks, and source limits.

Essay FocusAI DetectionSource Restrictions
“This guy uses Ai to check for Ai use, make it make sense.”
ETHST1
“You are NOT allowed to use outside sources.”
HIST10

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Do yourself a favor and stay away from him.”

Voice snapshots generated from 45 reviews, , and low recommendation. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“He doesn't teach, all he would do was upload documentaries and books that absolutely no one had time for.”

👎 Recommendation Rate

24/100

“ .”

⚖️

15/100

“He failed all of . Has no heart. ”

📚 Workload Load

25/100

“A lot if reading, 100+ pages, 3hr videos per week.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • just posts videos and gives an assignment.
  • Lectures are overdrawn and usually don't contain any real value.
  • Great lectures because .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • EVEN IF YOU FOLLOW HIS RUBRIC HE WILL STILL GIVE YOU A LOW GRADE.
  • there are no rubrics attached as to why he grades so low.
  • Because you're graded by very few assignments, the .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Character & Climate

  • He is rude, condescending.
  • Grade ethic very difficult gives automatic put downs instead of making comments to improve.
  • He truly cares about the success of his students.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

45

Recent reviews read by the AI

45

Lifetime ratings

85/100

Evidence confidence

Forty-five detailed reviews with strong consistency on harsh grading and .

Inside 45 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 54
3 out of 51
2 out of 56
1 out of 527

Course coverage

ETHST119 reviews
HIST8A7 reviews
HIST106 reviews
HIS8B4 reviews
730283 reviews
Show 2 more courses
HIST183 reviews
HIST8BH3 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

43 reported outcomes

A range

12

A+ 6 · A 6

B range

7

B+ 1 · B 5 · B- 1

C range

2

C+ 1 · C- 1

D range

6

D+ 2 · D 2 · D- 2

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

15

Drop/Withdrawal 6 · Not sure yet 7 · Rather not say 2