AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Okezie Aruoma

Courses not reported · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
37.5%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Avoid if you have another chem option; if and handle messy lectures.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerScattered LecturesTest-Heavy ChemistryTough GraderHard-to-Follow AccentSelf-Study Required
  • Most students say lectures are scattered and .
  • Course is test and and .
  • A minority of recent reviews find him lenient and lab-friendly, so experiences split.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Even strong students report grinding for B/C grades; exams dominate and .

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Chemistry content plus scattered lectures and test-heavy design make the course intellectually and practically hard.

All reviews are in person.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

while others do not; .

Only in-person data; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

34/100

Would-take-again sits near 38% with .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

28/100

, and exams on untaught material define the risk.

Format shift

In-person only; a couple recent reviews call him lenient, against the majority.

Workload

Heavy

36/100

Twelve labs, multiple exams, and .

Format shift

, and papers.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Knowledgeable but , with thick accent complaints and scattered conceptual lectures.

Format shift

In-person majority is negative; two newer reviews are more positive.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

; lectures often feel disconnected from tests.

Format shift

In-person comments emphasize .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, and research write-ups; many call teaching unclear while a few recent students pass with support.

Main concern

Lectures often fail to prepare students for .

What students said

“his method of teaching is awful, very scattered, and ”
50878
“Often had questions on the ”
50878
“He does really try to make sure you guys pass”
50878

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are high stakes, often include material students say was never clearly taught, and drive most of the grade.

Test HeavyExams Mismatch LecturesMultiple ExamsResearch Assignments

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and labs; students warn questions appear that were never taught.

4 Exams12 LabsTest HeavyLecture-Exam Mismatch
“Often had questions on the ”
50878
“The ”
50878
“12 labs, 4 exams and 4 research assignments”
50878

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I , if you can.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 in-person reviews, highlighting scattered teaching and . Credibility rating: Medium.

📉 Teaching Quality

32/100

“his method of teaching is awful, very scattered, and ”

🧪

30/100

“Often had questions on the ”

⚠️

34/100

“This chemistry professor should be fired immediately”

🙂 Minority Positive

55/100

“very lenient and has a way of explaining things well”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures were scattered, lacked focus
  • His accent is thick so it is difficult to understand
  • He tries to get you to understand from an

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Hard class
  • will randomly decide to give 50% to entire class for labs
  • Despite previously taking chemistry in the past, I found it very difficult to earn my A

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Experience

  • I had to with you-tube
  • Most of his students ended up dropping out
  • Nice person, but bad educator

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Only 8 reviews with mixed recent positivity lowers confidence, but repeated complaints about teaching and .

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 53

Course coverage

508788 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

2

C+ 1 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Rather not say 1