AI Rate Professor

Art

Nzuji De Magalhaes

Courses not reported · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.2/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.6

The decision

Avoid unless you already have strong art skills and can handle heavy outside work with .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderDoesn't TeachHeavy Outside WorkHarsh On BeginnersDrop Risk
  • Students say she demos briefly then expects full replication with almost no technique teaching.
  • Workload is crushing for a beginner art class with major projects left entirely outside class.
  • as extremely picky and harsh, with and C-range grades.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

unrealistic for most beginners.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Labeled beginner but pace, expectations, and lack of teaching make the content feel advanced and unforgiving.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Most students report time is not used for projects.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Nearly every review warns non-art majors and beginners to stay away due to no teaching and .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

and comments that .

Format shift

.

Workload

Overwhelming

15/100

Weekly overload plus major projects expected fully outside class with no studio time.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Students say she shows an image and expects replication without explaining techniques.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Grade is driven by heavy outside projects and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person studio feel with , and projects expected fully outside class under very harsh grading.

Main concern

No class time for major projects and .

What students said

“She doesn't really teach, she just expects you to copy what she does after a 3 min demo.”
72240
“ ! Ridiculously harsh! Like don't expect !”
72240
“I took this class spring 2025 and .”
72240

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews focus on picky project grading rather than a .

Project BasedHarsh RubricExtra Credit

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Assessment centers on outside projects graded very pickily; is the only noted softener.

Project BasedHarsh RubricExtra Credit
“ ! Ridiculously harsh! Like don't expect !”
72240
“The only good thing about this prof is the she gives.”
72240

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She doesn't really teach, she just expects you to copy what she does after a 3 min demo.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person reviews with strong agreement on poor instruction and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Teaching Quality

18/100

“She doesn't teach, she just shows you an image and tells .”

📉 Recommendation

8/100

“I would not recommend this teacher whether or not you're an art major.”

⚖️

12/100

“ ! Ridiculously harsh! Like don't expect !”

📦 Workload Overload

15/100

“She gives SO much work for only a week and the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She doesn't really teach, she just expects you to copy what she does after a 3 min demo.
  • She never took the time to teach the techniques she expected.
  • She just shows you an image and tells .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • ! Ridiculously harsh!
  • a beginner class.
  • .

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Honestly she's an all around good person.
  • I saw her going out of her way and really comforting other students.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Five recent detailed in-person reviews are highly consistent on poor teaching and , but the sample is small.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 54

Course coverage

722405 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

2

C 1 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1