AI Rate Professor

English

Jason Casem

ENGL51B · ENGL1H · ENGL26 · ENGLISH1H · ENG1 · ENGL3 · ENG1H · ENGL105 · ENGL51 · ENGL1 · ENGLISH3 · ENG3 · ENGL51A · ENG105 · ENGLISH1 · ENG801B · 87 lifetime ratings

AI rating
76/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
75.44%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if you want to become a stronger writer and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardDetailed writing feedbackParticipation requiredBlunt workshop styleEssay-focused gradingTransforms writers
  • Most students say he genuinely and constant practice.
  • Participation and ; he calls on people and .
  • A minority experience public criticism as humiliating, so shy students should go in eyes open.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Many students earn As and A+s when they revise and participate, but he rejects half-effort and still expects serious writing work.

Both online and ; humiliation complaints are mostly in person.

Is the course easy?

Standard

44/100

, and multi-essay writing rather than free busywork.

Workload intensity is similar online and in person; workshops feel heavier in person.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Multiple reviews say missing more than a few classes can fail you and that .

; online still requires active participation.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

because writing improves dramatically despite a tough classroom personality.

Online reviews are almost all positive; critical minority.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

He is not a , but many say he rewards real effort and is not harsh if you try and revise.

Format shift

often than online students do.

Workload

Heavy

34/100

, and presentations create a heavy English workload.

Format shift

Both formats involve lots of reading and papers; .

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

and growth as a writer, offset by reports of blunt or humiliating critique.

Format shift

Online teaching comments are strongly positive; in-person quality is high but more polarized on tone.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

, and writing process more than traditional sit-down exams.

Format shift

Essay and workshop focus holds for both online and in-person sections.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

45 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In person he is widely loved as a , while critics say he is rude, puts students on the spot, and piles reading and papers.

Main concern

Blunt public critique and shy students.

What students said

“Professor Casem's class is great because he really helps you level up your writing skills.”
ENG3
“he called me to the front, put my work on the projector, then showed it the class as an example of what NOT to do.”
ENG1
“You will improve as a writer in this class. .”
ENGL51

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Limited online and Zoom-era , and growth in argumentative writing when students participate.

Main concern

Participation remains key even online, so passive students struggle.

What students said

“Professor Casem did a great job keeping everyone engaged during our zoom meetings and encourages students to find .”
ENGL3
“PARTICIPATION IS KEY!! Just participate and you'll love his class.”
ENG1
“The capabilities and find my writing style.”
ENGLISH3

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment centers on papers and workshops with .

Major essaysPeer workshopsParticipation gradingPresentationsFew traditional exams

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

- and workshop-heavy with presentations and public critique; .

3-4 major essaysPeer workshopPresentationsParticipation callsDetailed written feedback
“We had 3 essays where directed and develop our arguments.”
ENG3
“Second half of the course is 100% workshopping your colleagues' work as a group.”
ENGL51
“Grades mainly on essays that you also have to present in front of the class.”
ENGL1

Online

Online sections emphasize argumentative essays, readings, and Zoom participation with .

Argumentative essaysZoom discussionReading responsesDetailed feedback
“I would would definitely recommend him for anyone who wants to learn how to write an .”
ENGL3
“Also his writing assignments aren't hard just have an :)”
ENGL1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (5 online, 45 in , and blunt critique. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“He will make you a better writer.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

76/100

“I would 100% take his class again. He is one of the .”

🗣️ Harsh Public Critique

35/100

“He is disrespectful to students... I received an A but i cried all semester.”

✍️

85/100

“ , and all students participate in .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He's a cool and funny guy, and you can tell that he wants his students to succeed.
  • He cares and their OWN writing.
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • He's not a and loves class participation.
  • if you want an easy class but if you want to learn and !!
  • If you miss over 3 classes you could fail the class.

Theme 3

📝 About Writing Workshops

  • You will improve as a writer in this class.
  • His writing workshop is a place to explore and to develop.
  • Get ready to present!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

87

Lifetime ratings

91/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty detailed reviews with many recent comments, clear grade patterns, and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 563
4 out of 59
3 out of 50
2 out of 55
1 out of 510

Course coverage

ENG310 reviews
ENG18 reviews
ENGL15 reviews
ENGL515 reviews
ENG1H4 reviews
Show 11 more courses
ENGL1H3 reviews
ENGLISH13 reviews
ENG1052 reviews
ENGL32 reviews
ENGLISH1H2 reviews
ENG801B1 review
ENGL1051 review
ENGL261 review
ENGL51A1 review
ENGL51B1 review
ENGLISH31 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

41 reported outcomes

A range

32

A+ 9 · A 20 · A- 3

B range

4

B+ 2 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Audit/No Grade 2 · Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Rather not say 2