AI Rate Professor

Anthropology

Carmen Laguer Diaz

ANTHR3 · ANTHR2 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
92/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
83.33%
Difficulty
1.8

The decision

with generous if you show up and do the simple work.

Best fit · Easy A HunterCaring and empatheticExtra credit heavyParticipation mattersEasy A with show-up workGroup projects
  • Nearly all students report A or A+ with lots of and flexible late work.
  • In-person classes lean on in-class workbooks and participation; and reading.
  • Warm, accessible instructor who wants everyone to succeed; one outlier disliked a .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

94/100

Every reported grade is A or A+, with , late flexibility, and .

Both online and in-person reviews report easy As; online adds reading and .

Is the course easy?

Introductory

86/100

Content is described as simple busywork and discussion-based, though one online student said it was not purely easy.

; but slightly more demanding for some.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

workbooks and a large share of the grade.

; in-person is clearly mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

Strong take-again sentiment for , and despite one low-quality online review.

; online is mostly positive with one harsh outlier.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

92/100

Students report easy assignments, late turn-ins, and abundant with all A or A+ grades.

Format shift

Leniency is strong in both formats; .

Workload

Light

78/100

, and reading rather than heavy projects.

Format shift

In-person has more in-class busywork; online leans on reading and modules.

Teaching experience

Excellent

86/100

, and fun, though one note says she answered questions more than lectured.

Format shift

and lectures; online praises organization and feedback.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Grades lean on in-class workbooks, participation, quizzes, group work, and modules more than high-stakes finals.

Format shift

; online uses modules, quizzes, and videos.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person is very easy with , and heavy in-class assignment weight; she is caring and gives abundant .

Main concern

Attendance and in-class busywork matter a lot even when content is simple.

What students said

“Super understanding; there is no way you can fail this class.”
ANTHR2
“very easy class but you have to show up because almost 60% of the grade was in class assignments”
ANTHR3
“ and always have lots of .”
ANTHR2

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online sections feel organized with short videos and reading; and helpful, though .

Main concern

One older review flagged half-Quizlet tests with an incomprehensible other half.

What students said

“really easy class, very helpful & communicative, lots of ”
ANTHR2
“The and illustrated with short punchy videos, but I wouldn't call it easy.”
ANTHR3
“the and then make the other half incomprehensible to compensate.”
ANTHR3

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and in-class work rather than clearly proctored high-stakes exams.

Weekly quizzesModule testsUnit quizzesIn-class workbooks

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person work includes weekly quizzes, unit quizzes, and in-class workbooks; .

Weekly quizzesUnit quizzesIn-class workbooks
“2 weekly module tests, and 3 unit quizzes throughout. A lot of .”
ANTHR3
“1 lecture/workbook in class and 1 weekly quiz.”
ANTHR2

Online

Online reviews mention module tests and quizzes; one student said a .

Module testsQuizzesMixed Quizlet-style test
“the and then make the other half incomprehensible to compensate.”
ANTHR3

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Super understanding; there is no way you can fail this class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

86/100

“She is amazing and so easy to understand. Always helpful and willing to work with .”

🅰️ Easy A Reality

94/100

“there is no way you can fail this class.”

❤️ Caring Instructor

90/100

“First, she is very empathetic to her students. You can tell she cares and will always reach out if she feels you need it.”

👍

90/100

“ and would take her course again.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • every class felt like a discussion
  • Classes are fun and and manageable
  • she didn't really teach and

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • really easy class, very helpful & communicative, lots of
  • very easy class but you have to show up
  • and always have lots of .

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She cares so much for her students and wants everyone to succeed
  • Very sweet and understanding professor and will let you turn things in late.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

12 recent reviews with consistent easy-A grades and and in-person formats.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ANTHR26 reviews
ANTHR36 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

12

A+ 4 · A 8

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values