AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Julianna Mojica

PSYCH2 · PSY14 · PSYCH1 · PSYCH14 · 18 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
47.06%
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

if you can succeed with posted notes and little instructor contact; avoid if .

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarized reviewsSlow email repliesLecture and test focusedFew graded itemsStudy guide heavy
  • Course content is usually easy, but experience quality is highly split between great lectures and poor responsiveness.
  • , yet some students report trick exam questions and rigid final policies.
  • Email delays and late grade posting are the most consistent red flags across formats.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Many report easy As from notes and few assignments, but and .

Online students still often report As despite complaints; and GPA-risk stories.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

80/100

Psychology 1 content is repeatedly called simple, straightforward, and passable from lecture notes alone.

Both formats describe easy material; .

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

72/100

because notes and study guides are posted online.

In-person often optional in practice; online has .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

47/100

About half love the ease and lectures while nearly half warn about silence, delayed grades, and GPA risk.

In-person is more mixed-to-positive; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Few graded items and help some students, but others face trick options, delayed grades, and .

Format shift

Online includes a ; and tough-grader tags.

Workload

Light

78/100

Often only a few exams, limited papers, and notes-based prep with .

Format shift

Both formats emphasize few graded things; winter online still felt light on workload but slow on posting.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

Some find lectures interesting and caring; many others call them dull, silent, or .

Format shift

In-person teaching praise is higher; online teaching is judged mainly through responsiveness failures.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

maybe one paper, with lowest exam sometimes dropped.

Format shift

exams dominate; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, and drop-lowest-test policies or hate dull lecturing, trick questions, and no email replies.

Main concern

Inconsistent engagement and communication mean outcomes depend heavily .

What students said

“The ”
PSYCH1
“She tricks you on the ”
PSYCH1
“She sent out one email at the beginning of the semester and then went MIA for weeks”
PSYCH2

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

slow posting and , and one severe grade dispute.

Main concern

Poor communication and inflexible online deadlines can tank grades even when content is easy.

What students said

“Good luck reaching out to her. How can one say their primary method of but .”
PSYCH1
“Took ! ”
PSYCH1
“she told me ”
PSYCH1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests usually come from lectures and study guides, but several students say wording is tricky and can block easy As.

Study guide aligned testsLecture based questionsSimilar-looking answer choicesFew exams total

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and lecture notes, though some report nearly identical answer traps.

Study guidesDrop lowest test sometimesLecture and practice test based
“ and practice tests”
PSYCH1
“She tricks you on the by giving you answers that look almost the same.”
PSYCH1

Online

Online tests are described as confusing with similar answers; .

Confusing multiple choiceSlow grade return
“ so you second guess which one was correct.”
PSYCH1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She sent out one email at the beginning of the semester and then went MIA for weeks and never responded to any emails.”

Voice snapshots generated from 18 reviews with strong positive-negative split and recurring contact issues. Credibility rating: Medium.

📬 Communication Risk

30/100

“Good luck reaching out to her.”

📗 Easy When Self-Directed

80/100

“Very easy class!!”

📝 Study-Guide Exams

70/100

“The ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lectures were straightforward, but they were also usually very dull
  • She's great at explaining and easy to understand
  • lectures the entire time

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • I got graded for just doing the work
  • She tricks you on the test
  • Easy Peasy!!

Theme 3

✉️ About Responsiveness

  • went MIA for weeks
  • never got back to me
  • Took

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

18

Recent reviews read by the AI

18

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

Eighteen detailed reviews show strong polarization with recurring communication themes, supporting a medium-confidence mixed portrait.

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 53
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 56

Course coverage

PSYCH115 reviews
PSY141 review
PSYCH141 review
PSYCH21 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 2 · A 5

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values