AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Jennifer Duarte

PSYCH1 · PSYCH2228 · PSYCH6 · PSYCH33 · PSYCH10 · PSYCH2 · PSYCH11 · 35 lifetime ratings

AI rating
69/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
68.57%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

Worth it if you attend, do the reading, and ; skip if you need tight structure and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring but unorganizedLecture heavyGroup projectsExtra credit availableTeach yourself risk
  • many call her caring with she cancels class and leaves students to self-teach.
  • Online and research-methods style sections draw , and heavy group papers.
  • In-person psych intros often praised for , and when students show up and read.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

76/100

Many students report an easy A with , and late paper flexibility, though research-heavy sections demand real work.

Online easy-A comments cluster in PSYCH11; in-person easy-A claims appear in PSYCH1/10, while PSYCH2 online is harder to secure.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Intro psych content is often called simple or interesting, but research methods and .

Online PSYCH11 is repeatedly called super simple; in-person and methods courses feel more standard to challenging.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

38/100

and tags like skip class you will not pass appear, though some online sections treat meetings as optional.

In-person is usually mandatory; and optional Zoom or check-ins.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

and fair grades, tempered by recurring organization and self-teach complaints.

; online recs swing harder between love and avoid.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

, , and note-allowed exams help grades, though slow or outdated grading frustrates some.

Format shift

Online complaints focus on delayed grades; and late acceptance.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Expect , and often a research paper or group project rather than a featherlight load.

Format shift

Online methods courses feel heavier with group papers; many intro sections stay moderate with few exams.

Teaching experience

Good

64/100

Strong when interactive and caring, weak when unorganized, unreachable, or lecture-from-the-book with little support.

Format shift

; online quality is highly split by term and course.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

Mix of , and a substantial paper or group research project depending on the course.

Format shift

Online PSYCH2 leans assignment and research paper heavy; , and a few tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

20 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

, and a path to an A if and show up, with a minority calling lectures unhelpful or too fast.

Main concern

Attendance and note-taking matter a lot; a few students .

What students said

“her tests and homework were easy and . . easy A”
PSYCH10
“She can't teach. More like talking to herself. Her lectures never helped me.”
PSYCH1
“lets you . you have to read the chapters though to actually get a good grade on the tests.”
PSYCH10

Remote format

Online

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

As with voice-recorded work and office-hour to chaotic research courses with canceled meetings, unresponsive groups, and late grading.

Main concern

and straightforward, others feel like zero instruction with a .

What students said

“If you do all the work, not AI, you will get an A. if the class was online.”
PSYCH11
“This class was a joke. Professor Duarte didn't teach the class. and then we were on our own.”
PSYCH2
“For my class, she didn't grade a single non-automatic graded assignment until after the class ended.”
PSYCH6

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and notes; policies vary by section and are not uniformly open-book.

Notes allowed on some examsReading-based testsFew exams per termVoice-recorded work bans AI

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

notes may be allowed and reading plus lecture notes matter most.

Notes during examsFew examsReading required
“lets you .”
PSYCH10
“ and she offered plenty of .”
PSYCH11

Online

Online comments mention straightforward tests if and bans on AI; proctoring details are not clearly proven.

Reading-based testsNo AI workVoice-recorded assignments
“Material was simple and tests as well.”
PSYCH11
“ as long as you did the readings.”
PSYCH11

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“so confused as to why there are so many negative reviews about her, i enjoyed her class. it was very interesting and easy lol. her tests and and . . easy A”

Voice snapshots generated from 35 reviews (15 online, 20 in , and organization themes. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

64/100

“One of the ! Im sooo glad I found her.”

👍 Recommendation Split

68/100

“Please think twice before enrolling.”

📝 Easy A Path

76/100

“If you do all the work, not AI, you will get an A.”

⚠️ Organization Risk

40/100

“She doesn't reply back to your email, doesn't put out any announcement meaning you would have to get on every day to see when your hw is due or . .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Amazing lectures
  • More like talking to herself. Her lectures never helped me.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • easy A
  • Super simple class
  • .

Theme 3

❤️ About Character and Support

  • She is so kind
  • very caring and wants to see her students do well
  • She offered literally zero support.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

35

Recent reviews read by the AI

35

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

35 detailed reviews spanning 2019-2025 with consistent themes of caring lectures versus organization problems give strong, balanced evidence.

Inside 35 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 519
4 out of 55
3 out of 52
2 out of 53
1 out of 56

Course coverage

PSYCH111 reviews
PSYCH119 reviews
PSYCH27 reviews
PSYCH103 reviews
PSYCH332 reviews
Show 2 more courses
PSYCH62 reviews
PSYCH22281 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

26 reported outcomes

A range

16

A+ 3 · A 13

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 3

C range

3

C+ 2 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2