AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Rachel Hollenberg

PHIL11 · PHIL1 · PHIL10H · PHIL1LOGICS · PHIL22 · PHIL12 · PHIL10 · PHIL07 · LOGIC · 102 lifetime ratings

AI rating
93/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
92.42%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you will read, participate, and ; she is one of the strongest philosophy options at the school.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring and accessibleClear feedbackHeavy readingsRedo-friendlyLogic specialist
  • , and highly recommended across philosophy and logic.
  • Readings and discussions are substantial; .
  • She often allows redos, late work, and office-hour help that make hard material passable.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

66/100

Redos and clear help raise the ceiling, but tough papers, readings, and .

Online redos make As easier; and in-person rigor balance the score.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Philosophy and logic content is often dense, while her teaching lowers the barrier without making it trivial.

; logic stays hard but well supported online and in person.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

58/100

, but participation often counts and skipping hurts discussion grades.

Online is freer; and speaking as important.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

92/100

Roughly nine in and many call her a top LBCC professor.

Strong recommendation holds online and in person despite a small cluster of negative online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

74/100

Frequent feedback, redos, late-work grace, and student .

Format shift

Online flexibility is highest; a few recent online reviews still call criteria messy or harsh.

Workload

Moderate

54/100

Weekly readings, discussions, quizzes, and essays are steady but usually manageable.

Format shift

; online 8-week courses can feel denser.

Teaching experience

Excellent

91/100

Students repeatedly praise clarity, kindness, accessibility, and skill teaching hard logic and sensitive topics.

Format shift

Praise is strong in both formats; recent online negatives are the main outliers.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Discussions, quizzes, essays, and .

Format shift

Online leans quizzes and essays; and participation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

26 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

, and caring facilitation of serious topics.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“Dr. Hollenberg guided us kindly through the abstruse world of symbolic logic”
PHIL22
“She wants to help you understand and succeed.”
PHIL10H
“this class is not for the weak! if discussions”
PHIL10

Remote format

Online

24 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online sections are mostly flexible and , and redo chances, though a few recent tough-grader complaints stand out.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“accepts late work up until the last day of semester so revise and ”
PHIL12
“ ; there are two essays, and they are also easy.”
PHIL10
“ !”
PHIL1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and straightforward quizzes rather than strict proctored exams.

QuizzesEssaysRedo opportunitiesDiscussion posts

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

76/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and participation-heavy discussions rather than strict proctoring reports.

Discussion participationQuizzesEssays
“ and a handful of quizzes.”
PHIL10H
“there are no tests so there is less anxiety.”
PHIL12

Online

, and discussion posts with many chances to revise for credit.

QuizzesEssaysLate work acceptedAssignment redos
“ but .”
PHIL12
“gives you the opportunity to if you show you understand”
PHIL22

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is one of the ! She is straight forward and teaches the subject very well and she will go out of her way so you can pass her class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, balancing and occasional grading complaints. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

91/100

“Professor Hollenberg is one of, if not the .”

❤️ Care and Access

90/100

“She really wants her class to succeed. One of chances she gives to redo assignments”

📚 Reading Load

45/100

“Be prepared and discuss some serious topics.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

92/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • guided us kindly through the abstruse world of symbolic logic
  • makes an effort to learn more about you and is super sweet
  • breaks it down nicely

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • if you put in the work, you will get the grade you want
  • ; there are two essays, and they are also easy
  • ! MAKES NO SENSE

Theme 3

💬 About Classroom Climate

  • makes students feel comfortable in very serious and sensitive topics
  • never shames people for not knowing questions
  • welcoming classroom environment and encourages individual participation

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

102

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

50 detailed reviews across many years and both formats show strong consistency with only a small negative cluster.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 580
4 out of 59
3 out of 53
2 out of 57
1 out of 53

Course coverage

PHIL1216 reviews
PHIL2211 reviews
PHIL109 reviews
PHIL17 reviews
PHIL10H3 reviews
Show 4 more courses
LOGIC1 review
PHIL071 review
PHIL111 review
PHIL1LOGICS1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

41 reported outcomes

A range

22

A+ 2 · A 18 · A- 2

B range

9

B+ 2 · B 6 · B- 1

C range

3

C 1 · C- 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

7

Not sure yet 5 · Rather not say 2