AI Rate Professor

Art

Angela Willcocks

DMA1 · ART44 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Avoid unless you have a , and want a strict, high-pressure studio experience.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerBroken Canvas LinksOutdated Mac-Only GuidesPoor Email ResponseTough GraderFigure-It-Out Style
  • Online courses suffer from broken Canvas links, outdated Mac-focused instructions, and weak communication.
  • Students report rudeness or and discussion questions.
  • In-person can push growth for motivated artists, but she is a and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Even when grades land at A or , and heavy self-troubleshooting.

Online reviews dominate; the .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content difficulty is moderate, but broken materials and tool barriers make the experience harder than the subject alone.

Online friction is the main barrier; in-person is described as intense rather than conceptually advanced.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

40/100

Online attendance reports mix optional and mandatory; and participation pressure.

Online is mixed; the .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

, and online students urge others not to enroll due to broken materials and communication.

All three online reviews are strongly negative; the in-person 5-star .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

; exists but does not offset strict scoring.

Format shift

Both formats call her a .

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Workload is not described as , but broken instructions force extra self-research time.

Format shift

Online students lose time fixing links and finding PC workarounds.

Teaching experience

Awful

20/100

Students cite outdated lectures, no audio, non-response to questions, and a figure-it-out approach.

Format shift

Online teaching experience is harshly criticized; .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Assessment centers on digital art projects and participation rather than formal exams.

Format shift

Reviews emphasize assignments and rubrics, not exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

One in-person ART44 review calls her a if you accept the struggle.

Main concern

and intense pressure; not for students seeking an easy art elective.

What students said

“She is a and has a ton of personality. Expect to be pushed to your limit and more.”
ART44

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online DMA/ART sections are plagued by broken links, outdated non-audio resources, Mac-only directions, and .

Main concern

Broken course materials and unresponsive communication make the class unnavigable.

What students said

“ she does not bother to fix.”
DMA1
“ if you don't have a Mac computer because all her directions are for Macs.”
ART44
“The and has a figure it out teaching style.”
ART44

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly describe traditional exams; and participation with strict rubrics.

Project-basedRubric attachedNo clear exam policy stated

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; focus is strict project grading and participation.

Strict project gradingParticipation matters
“She is a and has a ton of personality.”
ART44

Online

Online reviews ; assessment appears project and assignment based with broken resource links.

Project assignmentsBroken resource linksExtra credit mentioned
“There is a , but needs further clarification.”
DMA1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ she does not bother to fix. Most of her lectures are outdated and not updated to the newer versions, so instructions are unclear.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting broken online materials and . Credibility rating: Low.

📉 Teaching Quality

20/100

“The and has a figure it out teaching style, and does not post zoom meeting to reference to later.”

🚫 Recommendation Rate

12/100

“Horrible, absolutely horrible. if you don't have a Mac computer because all her directions are for Macs.”

🔗 Broken Course Materials

18/100

“The course page has broken links that she does not care to fix, which makes it hard to navigate to the assignments.”

Theme 1

💻 About Online Course Setup

  • she does not bother to fix.
  • This course is taught with online resources that are not up to date and has no audio.
  • Outdated instructions too.

Theme 2

📈 and Pressure

  • She is a and has a ton of personality.
  • Expect to be pushed to your limit and more.
  • if you're willing to struggle to improve.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only 4 reviews with sparse detail and one old in-person report limit confidence despite consistent online complaints.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ART443 reviews
DMA11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1