AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Teri Malouf

MATH110B · MATH45 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you show up and , but verify current MATH45 style given one strong recent complaint.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear lecturesTest aligned to notesCaring supportHomework heavy practiceMixed recent feedback
  • Older reviews praise crystal-clear lectures that stick tightly to the book and tests.
  • One recent MATH45 review says she is detached, outsources answers, and uses non-her lecture videos.
  • Workload and , but older students felt she helped them pass.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

45/100

Older notes say tests stay fair if you practice, but and As still take work.

All evidence is in person; no online reviews exist.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content difficulty spans from moderate math practice to a recent 5/5 difficulty rating, so overall challenge is mid-level.

Only in-person MATH45 and MATH110B comments available.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Every review that as mandatory and expects students to show up and participate.

All four reviews are in person with .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

Three strong older raves are and only about half take-again signal.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Tests match what she teaches and older students call her fair, though and test-heavy tags still appear.

Format shift

In-person only; .

Workload

Heavy

35/100

, and test focus create a substantial math workload.

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

, while one recent review reports detachment and weak live teaching.

Format shift

All teaching comments are in person; older MATH110B praise is stronger than 2025 MATH45 feedback.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Test heavy tags, easy-but-aligned tests after mandatory practice homework, and .

Format shift

In-person only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

classic clear, fair testing praise from older MATH110B notes versus a harsh 2025 MATH45 critique about detachment and non-original videos.

Main concern

Recent student felt unsupported and redirected to Google or classmates instead of taught in class.

What students said

“Prof. Malouf teaches with clarity and understanding. Her method/style of teaching is easily grasped.”
MATH110B
“She's detached from the students' needs. She doesn't answer certain questions and would say to google it or ask another classmate.”
MATH45
“VERY VERY excellent teacher. Although I barely passed, I will admit she extends her hand far for you to reach and pass as well.”
MATH45

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams stick to book and lecture content and can feel fair if you complete practice, with as a risk.

Tests match taught materialPop quizzesTest heavyHomework practice before exams

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person students say she does not put untaught items on tests and can keep exams simpler if .

Tests match lecturesPop quizzesTest heavy
“She does not deveate from the book or put anything on the .”
MATH110B
“makes the test easy and non complex. If she wanted to, she could make the as hard.”
MATH45

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Prof. Malouf teaches with clarity and understanding. Her method/style of teaching is easily grasped. She does not deveate from the book or put anything on the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person reviews only, weighing older clarity praise against one recent support critique. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Clarity

70/100

“ and easily grasped.”

⚠️ Recent Detachment

30/100

“She's detached from the students' needs. She doesn't answer certain questions and would say to google it”

📝

60/100

“She does not deveate from the book or put anything on the .”

💪 Support to Pass

65/100

“she extends her hand far for you to reach and pass as well.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • teaches with clarity and understanding
  • She takes time explaining each chapter
  • The lecture videos is not her but some random woman

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • makes the test easy and non complex
  • Although I barely passed

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only four reviews, with two nearly identical 2015 posts and a sharp split between older praise and one 2025 complaint.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH110B2 reviews
MATH452 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values