AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Nicholas Nardi

RESEARCHMETHODS · PSYCH1 · PSYCH4 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
16.67%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Avoid if you need flexibility or feedback; if you can self-pace and never miss deadlines.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnresponsiveNo Late WorkQuizzes Not ReturnedGraded By Few ThingsApathetic
  • Most reviews are online and describe low empathy, weak flexibility, and poor communication.
  • Students cannot review quiz answers, which makes studying and grade recovery hard.
  • A couple of courses are passable if you stay on schedule, but overall recommendation is low.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

48/100

An A is possible with and work, but few graded items and .

Almost all evidence is online; but still disliked the class.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

Material is standard intro or methods level, not brain-burner, but errors in .

Online comments drive this judgment; the hardness.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

85/100

; the course is mostly asynchronous self-paced work.

Online attendance is optional; the .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

Only about 17% would take again, with and feedback.

Online recent reviews are mostly negative; the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

No late work, tough grader tags, and .

Format shift

Online reviews dominate this picture; .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Reading, frequent short quizzes, and a but not light load.

Format shift

Online workload comments are the main evidence.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Students describe apathy, weak responsiveness, recycled content, and low engagement in person.

Format shift

Both online and the .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

70/100

items mean exam-style assessments dominate.

Format shift

Online students stress weekly quizzes; research methods also has a .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The phone, unmemorable, and not recommended.

Main concern

Low engagement, ignores raised hands, and students report learning little.

What students said

“hes way too laid back and is constantly on his phone when hes not lecturing.”
PSYCH1

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online sections feel recycled and disconnected, with no late work and quizzes students cannot review.

Main concern

Unresponsive instructor, no late credit, and quizzes locked so you cannot learn from mistakes.

What students said

“He really does not care or show empathy regarding what might be affecting your work outside of the course.”
Psych-4
“ ! How am I supposed to know what I'm getting wrong and what to study?”
PSYCH1
“He doesnt accept late work. Be prepared for the .”
RESEARCHMETHODS

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Quizzes are high stakes, answers are not returned for review, and .

Quizzes Not ReturnedTwo Quizzes A WeekNo Late WorkResearch Group Project

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The single in-person review does not clearly describe exam proctoring or format beyond general disengagement.

Online

Online students cannot get quizzes back to study mistakes, and late research work is not accepted.

Quizzes Not ReturnedNo Late CreditFrequent Short Quizzes
“ ! How am I supposed to know what I'm getting wrong and what to study?”
PSYCH1
“Absolutely no late credit despite the the semester.”
Psych-4
“there's up to two quizzes a week, 5 questions w/similar multiple choice answers”
PSYCH1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you can.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting low engagement and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

30/100

“He really does not care or show empathy regarding what might be affecting your work outside of the course.”

🚫 Recommendation

20/100

“ .”

📝

25/100

“ ! How am I supposed to know what I'm getting wrong and what to study?”

⏰ Flexibility

20/100

“Absolutely no late credit despite the the semester.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • this class was great, it was sufficient enough for me to learn
  • constantly on his phone when hes not lecturing

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • You can pass with an A as long as you do the reading and work
  • get 2 questions wrong and watch your grade plummet

Theme 3

🔒

  • He doesnt accept late work
  • clearly recycled as there are various errors in the assignments

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Only 6 reviews, mostly online 2022-2024, with consistent negatives but low sample size keep credibility medium.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

PSYCH13 reviews
Psych-42 reviews
RESEARCHMETHODS1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

2

B 1 · B- 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1