AI Rate Professor

Communication

Eric Siberio

COMM25 · COMM10 · COMM60 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
61.54%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you want strong feedback; be cautious with online and heavy COMM sections.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizing experienceGreat speech feedbackHeavy homeworkPicky graderParticipation heavy
  • Older in-person COMM courses , and supportive speaking culture.
  • Several online and recent reviews slam unclear instructions, , and .
  • Success depends on format and willingness to participate; not a reliable easy A.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

, and high expectations mean solid grades require sustained effort, not minimal work.

; in-person still warns it is not an easy A.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is college-standard communication work with speeches and but not light either.

Online stress is higher due to workload logistics; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

and in-person participation.

Both formats often require presence for speeches; online is not truly flexible.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

About six in ; glowing speech-class praise clashes with and clarity.

In-person recommendations run warmer; online and some COMM25/60 comments are harsher.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

42/100

Some say fair speech feedback; others call him picky and tough, so .

Format shift

Online reviews lean tougher; older in-person reviews feel fairer.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Multiple comments cite lots of , and stacked large assignments.

Format shift

Online COMM25/60 carry the heaviest load complaints; speech classes feel more moderate.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Passionate and helpful in many speech settings, but and poor communication pull quality down overall.

Format shift

In-person teaching is rated higher; online quality is much more polarized.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Speeches, papers, group projects, and ; .

Format shift

True for both formats; online adds more written work complaints.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mostly strong on passion, participation, and public-speaking growth, with a couple of .

Main concern

and picky expectations; not ideal if you only want an easy grade.

What students said

“Professor Siberio is a really great Professor who encourages his students to use their voices”
COMM60
“If you're looking for an easy A then this class isn't for you.”
COMM25
“I wouldn't recommend this class. He does not give a be done”
COMM10

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, and weak communication.

Main concern

, and slow or .

What students said

“ . Ive never been so stressed in my life.”
COMM60
“ .”
COMM25
“Prof Siberio is a great teacher! Public Speaking can be difficult, especially online, but he was very encouraging”
COMM10

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment centers on presentations and assignments; proctoring.

Speeches and presentationsPop quizzes possibleParticipation gradedAssignment-heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person assessment emphasizes participation, speeches, and .

Participation heavyPresentationsBeware of pop quizzes
“Beware of pop quizzes”
COMM25
“Lots of participation, but it's fun.”
COMM60

Online

Online work focuses on speeches via Zoom, papers, and assignments; reviews do not clearly prove webcam proctoring.

Zoom speechesPapers and homeworkFeedback after speeches
“Lectures were pre-recorded and we only met on Zoom on the days we gave our speeches.”
COMM10
“Hes so and presentation.”
COMM60

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . Ive never been so stressed in my life.”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews, contrasting strong in-person speech praise with online stress and clarity complaints. Credibility rating: Medium.

🔀 Polarized Quality

55/100

“Professor was one of the .”

📚 Heavy Workload

35/100

“I seriously cried because of the amount of ”

🗣️

70/100

“ and is very encouraging.”

⚠️ Clarity Issues

40/100

“He does not give a be done”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • very passionate about his lectures
  • sucks a

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you're looking for an easy A then this class isn't for you
  • The work is easy just hes difficult to please

Theme 3

💻 Online vs In Person

  • In the end, you will have fun
  • Hes very bad at answering emails

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Thirteen reviews with and polarized scores give useful signal, but sample size and older positives reduce certainty.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 55

Course coverage

COMM105 reviews
COMM605 reviews
COMM253 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

5

A 5

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2