AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Diane Ford

STAT1 · MATH47 · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
54/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
57.89%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if and stay engaged; otherwise consider another stats or math professor.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHomework-heavy statsExam retakes possibleLecture heavyPolarizing demeanorExtra credit offered
  • Students and calling her distracted or rude
  • but
  • Success depends on paying attention in lecture and grinding the

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

As are common when students finish all homework and , but .

Most grade evidence is in person; online sample is too small for a separate pattern.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Stats and calc content is standard college difficulty that becomes manageable with .

In-person students report clearer day-to-day practice; online calcs felt messier to some.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

Some sections treat attendance as optional while if .

; in person answers split between mandatory and not.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

54/100

About half strongly endorse her help and retakes while others urge avoiding her for tone and clarity issues.

; only two online reviews exist.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Homework points, late passes, and on top of work.

Format shift

Retake and homework-buffer comments are mainly from in-person STAT1.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Lots of , and lecture-linked practice are the dominant workload theme.

Format shift

; online also complains about long lectures.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

Some students say she makes stats click and cares, while others report distraction, sarcasm, or .

Format shift

Positive and negative teaching claims are mostly in-person; online is split 4 vs 2 quality.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Grades combine online , and .

Format shift

In-person STAT1 details are richest; online MATH47 stresses homework and quizzes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person STAT1 and MATH47 reviews range from A+ success stories with and poor clarity.

Main concern

Tone and classroom respect issues appear in several recent low ratings.

What students said

“She also lets you retake 2 chapters from an exam.”
STAT1
“ and mention their grades to the whole class”
STAT1
“Amazing professor! Super knowledgeable and actually makes stats easy to understand.”
STAT1

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Limited online MATH47 feedback is mixed between guided support and messy lectures with constant quizzes.

Main concern

Long prerecorded lectures and shifting due dates frustrate some students.

What students said

“Ford cares & guides you. Be prepared to put in work.”
MATH47
“Prerecorded lectures are long and don't cover all the material.”
MATH47

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and homework volume buffering scores.

Multiple exams plus finalExam retakes limitedHomework mirrors testsProjects

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person STAT1 uses several exams, a , and .

4 exams plus finalRetake 2 chaptersOnline practice homework3 projects
“Grades are based upon online practice hw, 4 exams + final, & 3 projects.”
STAT1
“She also lets you retake 2 chapters from an exam.”
STAT1

Online

Sparse online comments mention quizzes and .

Frequent quizzesHomework heavy
“Says class isn't mandatory unless there is a quiz.. there's always a quiz.”
MATH47

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I wasn't good at math ever but taking her class earned me an A by doing all the homework and classwork.”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 , and polarized tone. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

52/100

“Amazing professor! Super knowledgeable and actually makes stats easy to understand.”

⚠️ Classroom Tone Risk

30/100

“ and mention their grades to the whole class”

📚

32/100

“She gives a lot of homework but if you don't do good on an exam.”

👍 Recommendation Split

54/100

“if given the so.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She answers every question and makes sure you get it
  • Lecture can be dreading but
  • Talks forever but doesn't stress what's on the test

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • did badly on
  • The & as are the projects
  • Never seen so

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She cares about your passing and will do everything to help
  • she is cool sweet and goofy
  • she literally chuckled and said "You don't have 15?"

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

19 reviews are detailed enough to show a real split, but the sample is moderate and online evidence is thin.

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 54
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 55

Course coverage

STAT111 reviews
MATH478 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

18 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 5 · A 5

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 3

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 1