AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Sabine Faulhaber

ENGR17L · ENGR50 · MATH50 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
20%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Avoid unless ; expect uneven teaching and weak organization.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnreliable attendanceBoring lecturesUnsupportiveMissed classesDO NOT TAKE
  • Students report frequent absences and poor communication with .
  • Grades can still be high, but many describe her as lazy, unsupportive, and lecture-heavy filler.
  • One older lab review was positive, but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Multiple students still earned A or A+ despite calling the teaching weak, so an A is often reachable without strong instruction.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Content is often light with worksheets and filler lectures, though a few report higher difficulty .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

while others say it is not, and absences by the professor further blur expectations.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

and most recent comments .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Students report high grades even while criticizing teaching quality and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

70/100

Workload is mostly worksheets and group .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Comments emphasize missed classes, boring lectures, poor transparency, and unsupportive behavior.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Assessment centers on worksheets, group projects, and few graded items rather than major exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

missed classes, inaccurate syllabus, boring filler lectures, and .

Main concern

, and low engagement in core lecture courses.

What students said

“This was an in person class, yet she missed probably half the semester.”
MATH50
“to lazy to make up a test so when student become resourceful she gets mad and blames it on the students instead of her laziness. !”
ENGR50
“Prof. and loved to talk about electronics.”
ENGR17L

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention pop quizzes and but do not clearly describe a .

Pop quizzesFew graded itemsLimited exam clarity

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments note pop quizzes and grading by few things, but .

Pop quizzesGraded by few things
“Syllabus not accurate. There are 11 chapters in precalculus—we only covered 6.”
MATH50
“to lazy to make up a test so when student become resourceful she gets mad”
ENGR50

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person reviews spanning 2020-2025, highlighting reliability and recommendation themes. Credibility rating: Medium.

⚠️ Teaching Reliability

28/100

“This was an in person class, yet she missed probably half the semester.”

👎 Recommendation Tone

22/100

“ !”

📝 Grade vs Effort

78/100

“Her work consisted of individual worksheets and group worksheets every week.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • missed probably half the semester
  • I was beyond bored in her class

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Lots of filler lectures
  • A+

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • really nice but I was beyond bored
  • doesn't care about her students

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Five mixed reviews across 2020-2025 provide clear themes but a small sample and .

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ENGR503 reviews
ENGR17L1 review
MATH501 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 3

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values