AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Claudia Molina

CHEM110 · CHEM3 · CHEM224 · CHEM2 · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
23.53%
Difficulty
4.2

The decision

Avoid if ; only consider if and already know the material.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough GraderTest HeavyConfusing LecturesDisorganizedHard to Understand
  • Most students say lectures are rushed, mumbled, and so they leave class unprepared for .
  • Grading is often harsh with , and weekly homework that can zero out for small mistakes.
  • A small minority of older CHEM2 reviews praise and easier exams, but the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Some students still earn high grades, but tough grading, test-heavy structure, and .

Both online and and ; positives about easy grades are rare and mostly older in-person CHEM2.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

, and thin on examples, so basic chem feels harder than it should.

Online and in-person both report high difficulty; online also adds access and organization friction.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

as mandatory and link presence to keeping up with .

; a few in-person and online reviews say no, so practice is not fully consistent.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

and repeated run-away language outweigh a handful of older positive CHEM2 reviews.

Online ; in-person has more volume and a few older fans but is still mostly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

problems, and hard unprepared exams dominate the .

Format shift

; the most extreme homework-zero complaint is in-person CHEM224.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Lots of , and test-heavy pacing leave little room for light effort.

Format shift

Workload complaints span online and in-person; a few older in-person CHEM2 posts claim lighter homework with .

Teaching experience

Poor

24/100

Students describe mumbled rushed lectures, weak explanations, impatience with questions, and .

Format shift

Both formats criticize teaching quality; a minority of in-person CHEM2 reviews call her kind and clear.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Tags and comments center on tests, pop quizzes, and few graded items rather than a balanced assignment-heavy path.

Format shift

Test-heavy language is common in both formats; CHEM2 review.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, and impatience with questions, with a few older positive CHEM2 outliers.

Main concern

Students feel unprepared for and report unfair or .

What students said

“ .”
CHEM224
“Every student is left clueless after each lecture.”
CHEM224
“Believe the ratings! Chem 2 is such an easy class, so that fact that this teacher made it hard says something.”
CHEM2

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

hard , and organization issues.

Main concern

Poor communication and riskier online.

What students said

“She spoke really fast and could barely understand her with her heavy accent.”
CHEM110
“If !”
CHEM2
“ .”
CHEM2

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are widely called hard and poorly previewed, with little evidence of open-book or student-friendly exam design.

Test HeavyHard ExamsLittle Exam PrepPop QuizzesFew Graded Items

Assessment risk

Strict

34/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and she does not prepare students for them.

Hard ExamsNo Exam ReviewPop QuizzesTest Heavy
“ and she doesn't prepare us for them at all.”
CHEM224
“Never goes over whats .”
CHEM224

Online

Online reviews stress hard quizzes or tests and access problems but .

Hard Quizzes/TestsAccess Issues
“Couldn't access quizzes or tests so and .”
CHEM2

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 reviews spanning online and and grading themes. Credibility rating: High.

📉 Teaching Quality

24/100

“Every student is left clueless after each lecture.”

🚫 Recommendation Rate

22/100

“If !”

⚖️

22/100

“ .”

📝

34/100

“Doesnt prepare students for exams.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She spoke really fast and could barely understand her with her heavy accent.
  • she does not teach us and does not care if we understand.
  • Her teaching style is all over the place and hard to understand what her plan and direction is.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • and she doesn't prepare us for them at all.
  • will give you 0 points if you get more than 3 problems wrong.
  • Chem 2 is such an easy class, so that fact that this teacher made it hard says something.

Theme 3

💬 About Communication and Support

  • , and contradicts herself every class.
  • help during questions felt inconsistent—sometimes useful, sometimes dismissive.
  • She never emailed back and didnt change anything.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Seventeen detailed reviews across 2020-2026 with and confusing-lecture themes give a reliable negative picture despite a few older positives.

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 513

Course coverage

CHEM211 reviews
CHEM2243 reviews
CHEM1102 reviews
CHEM31 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 3 · A 1

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1