AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Ronda Wood

NSG22A · PEDS22 · ADN11B · ADN1 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
79/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if you want a fair, professional nursing instructor and will study the textbook deeply.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHighly professionalTough but fair testingNo favoritismAccessible by emailClinical and lecture readiness required
  • Students respect her organization, steady professionalism, and equal treatment.
  • Testing is hard; and understanding tables.
  • Clinical prep and approachability make the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

Reported grades include B and A, but and heavy study from the .

All grade and ; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Nursing and and clinical prep make this intellectually and practically demanding.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

and clinical-style courses.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

Modern students would take her again for professionalism, fairness, and real learning despite difficulty.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Students call her fair and free of favoritism, but testing is strict and study strategy is hard to master.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

36/100

Textbook reading, blank-filling lectures, clinical prep, and .

Format shift

Workload and peds reviews.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

, and steady compared with more labile nursing faculty.

Format shift

One older outlier calls her a dictator; recent reviews are strongly positive.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Hard testing drives the course, supported by textbook tables, lectures, and clinical preparedness.

Format shift

and NSG comments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person nursing and peds courses feel professional and fair; but and clinical prep.

Main concern

Difficult testing style and need to self-fill .

What students said

“She is difficult in regards to testing and how to study. READ the book and understand the tables in the book.”
PEDS22
“She can be difficult to approach at first but she's willing to go the extra mile for you to understand better.”
NSG22A
“She is tough, but you learn a lot from her. Come to clinical prepared and NCP filled out and you will be fine.”
PEDS22

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are tough and reward deep textbook reading; no student-friendly open-book or proctoring details are described.

Difficult examsTextbook tables criticalLecture fill-in-the-blank notesClinical NCP prep

Assessment risk

Strict

38/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person testing is described as difficult with study focused on the book and tables; clinical readiness is expected.

Hard testsRead the bookUnderstand tablesClinical preparedness
“She is difficult in regards to testing and how to study. READ the book and understand the tables in the book.”
PEDS22
“Come to clinical prepared and NCP filled out and you will be fine.”
PEDS22

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Dr. Wood was the most respected of the professors. Always professional, on time and steady in her mood.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 in-person nursing , and fairness. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Professional Teaching

82/100

“Always professional, on time and steady in her mood (most nursing teachers are labile).”

📚 Hard but Fair Testing

38/100

“She is difficult in regards to testing and how to study. READ the book and understand the tables in the book.”

👍 Recommendation

90/100

“takes ”

⚖️ No Favoritism

80/100

“She's very fair and shows no favoritism (unlike other instructors).”

Theme 1

👨‍⚕️ About Teaching Style

  • Very professional and doesn't show any favoritism
  • willing to go the extra mile for you to understand better
  • The clinical environment is less intimidating because

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Study

  • She is tough, but you learn a lot from her
  • I liked her lectures! It's simple and to the point but you do need to fill in the blanks with the reading materials
  • READ the book and understand the tables in the book

Theme 3

❤️ About Access and Care

  • takes

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Eight reviews with several recent detailed nursing comments support medium confidence, though older sparse entries reduce consistency.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PEDS224 reviews
NSG22A2 reviews
ADN11 review
ADN11B1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1