AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Luca Struble

PHIL22 · PHIL12 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
93/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you will keep up with notes and weekly work; .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerAmazing lecturesClear grading criteriaCares about successMakes hard logic clearConsistent weekly structure
  • Students say he turns .
  • 100% would-take-again vibe with passionate, supportive teaching.
  • Course content can still be challenging, .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

66/100

Students earn solid grades by staying consistent with readings and .

Online reviews stress consistency; the work.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Symbolic logic is inherently tricky, but his lectures and examples lower the barrier a lot.

Online has both easy-with-him and hard-online voices; .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Comments split between non-mandatory and .

Online reviews disagree on attendance; the .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

Every reviewed student would take him again and several call him among the .

Recommendation is unanimous across online and the single in-person review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

70/100

and supportive feedback help students succeed without sounding like .

Format shift

Evidence is mostly online; .

Workload

Moderate

52/100

, and discussion posts are consistent; older reviews mention lots of homework.

Format shift

One older online review tags lots of homework; newer online voices call the weekly load predictable.

Teaching experience

Excellent

91/100

Passionate, clear, example-heavy teaching that students say makes complex logic understandable.

Format shift

Strong teaching praise dominates both formats.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and exams all matter, with examples tied to same-day work and tests.

Format shift

and exams; online stresses weekly assignments and notes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

concepts into fine detail with exam-aligned examples and quick email replies.

Main concern

Content can still feel overwhelming at first even when teaching is strong.

What students said

“He breaks down every fine detail and will provide multiple examples that are on the and the .”
PHIL12

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online logic/philosophy is praised for , and active discussion posts, though one older review found the .

Main concern

Symbolic logic and the .

What students said

“for how complicated of a course it is, his lectures and example videos made it so clear and easy to understand.”
PHIL22
“The due dates and length of videos are consistent every week, making it easy to make time for.”
PHIL22
“Intro to Logic is hard when taking online.”
PHIL12

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and homework rather than surprise tricks; heavy proctoring is not clearly proven.

Homework-aligned examplesWeekly consistencyDiscussion postsLogic program homework

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

One in-person review says and the ; closed-book proctoring is not clearly proven.

Exam-aligned examplesHomework linkage
“He will provide multiple examples that are on the and the .”
PHIL12

Online

Online students , and logic-program homework; webcam lockdown is not clearly proven.

Lecture videosDiscussion postsLogic homework programConsistent due dates
“He provides concise lecture videos as well as .”
PHIL22
“Hwk uses Logic program that I find harder to get the right answers .”
PHIL12

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Dr. Stuble was the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews (5 online, 1 in person), highlighting clarity on hard logic and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

91/100

“his lectures and example videos made it so clear and easy to understand.”

👍

96/100

“ !”

🧠 Content Challenge

48/100

“Intro to Logic is hard when taking online.”

📋

85/100

“The due dates and length of videos are consistent every week, making it easy to make time for.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and wants his students to succeed.
  • He breaks down every fine detail
  • he genuinely cares about his students and their success.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Intro to Symbolic Logic (online) was easy with Professor Struble.
  • This class is not easy (for me at least)
  • If you stay consistent with and assignments, you'll definitely enjoy this interesting class.

Theme 3

💻 About Online Format

  • He'll always be active in the .
  • Prof has online book, video lectures
  • Take in class!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Six reviews spanning 2018-2025 with strong consistency on teaching quality, but and some older online friction.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHIL123 reviews
PHIL223 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 4

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1