AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Christina Charles-Bohannon

MATH40 · LEC74007 · STATS1 · MATH70 · STAT1 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
67/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
72.73%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you will attend, keep up with , and use cheat sheets; weaker math students should be ready to self-supplement.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyHilarious and caringCheat sheets allowedStudy guides match examsHomework heavyMixed for weak math bases
  • Many students who dislike and study guides.
  • Exams allow handwritten cheat sheets and guides that .
  • Struggling beginners sometimes drop or fail when lectures feel tedious or assume prior speed.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

As and B+s appear with and cheat-sheet exams, but drops and low averages show an A is not automatic.

Online reviews report easier As; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

46/100

Content is standard college math or stats made approachable, yet still demands practice and is hard for weak foundations.

Online felt easier to follow; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

Multiple reviews say do not miss class or you will be .

; online attendance is optional but work still piles up.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

and clarity, while a minority warn weaker students to choose someone else.

Both formats include strong recommenders; negatives concentrate in in-person struggles.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

, and cheat sheets help, without feeling like .

Format shift

Online comments emphasize leniency on deadlines; .

Workload

Heavy

38/100

, and multiple exams create steady load.

Format shift

; Aleks or Pearson fees appear online and in person.

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

, and inspirational, though some find lectures tedious or insufficient.

Format shift

Online praise is uniformly high; in-person has both raves and harsh teaching critiques.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Study guides, quizzes, multiple midterms, and a .

Format shift

and guides.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person math and stats split between glowing praise for humor and clarity and warnings of .

Main concern

Missing class or weak prior skills can leave you lost; some report class averages around 50 on exams.

What students said

“Practice study guides are extremely close to the .”
MATH40
“I'm a math hater, but she explained everything so well and made it easy to understand.”
STATS1
“people were failing and the class average on the exams were literally 50 & lower.”
MATH40

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Online MATH40 feels clear and lenient on deadlines, with lecture videos, notes, and Pearson tools that help weaker students.

Main concern

She can be hard to reach outside class and slow to grade.

What students said

“Im horrible at math but she made it super easy!”
MATH40
“she was very lenient when it came to certain deadlines(although this was online).”
MATH40

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, but cheat sheets and near-identical study guides make them more manageable.

Handwritten cheat sheetsStudy guides close to examsDrop one exam reportedWeekly quizzes

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

74/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person allows handwritten cheat sheets and practice guides extremely close to the real exams.

Handwritten cheat sheetsStudy guides match examsShort Thursday quizzes3 tests plus final
“Could .”
MATH40
“Practice study guides are extremely close to the .”
MATH40

Online

Online MATH40 uses several exams with one dropped plus discussion posts and MML-style practice.

4 exams one droppedPearson MMLDiscussion postsStudy guides
“4 study guides, 8 discussion posts, 4 exams (one gets dropped) & the final.”
MATH40

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I'm a math hater, but she explained everything so well and made it easy to understand.”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews (2 online, 10 in and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🧮 Math Anxiety Rescue

70/100

“Never in my life would I have imagined I would ended up saying things like "OMG this is so cool"”

📝

74/100

“Practice study guides are extremely close to the .”

⚠️ Not for Everyone

40/100

“ ! unless you're good .”

Theme 1

😂 About Teaching Style

  • Genuinely one of the so far
  • She's hilarious and
  • great teacher, she is helpful if you ask for help

Theme 2

📈

  • use cheat sheets for exams, and you'll pass
  • Keep up with homework
  • but it helps

Theme 3

🚧 About Struggle Risk

  • lectures are tedious and if you are taking it for the first time
  • class average on the exams were literally 50 & lower
  • Her lectures are unclear, she just goes over how to do the problem

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

12 reviews from 2016-2024 with detailed mixed experiences; solid detail but moderate sample and older negatives.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH406 reviews
STAT12 reviews
STATS12 reviews
LEC740071 review
MATH701 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

5

A 5

B range

3

B+ 2 · B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 3