AI Rate Professor

Photography

Nin Filip

PHOT43 · ART80 · PHOTO10 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
27/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
30%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Avoid Nin Filip unless you can self-manage a and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganizedUnclear LecturesPoor CommunicationTangentsChaotic Canvas
  • Most students say , and Canvas organization is broken.
  • Content itself is often not hard, but chaos, missing due dates, and .
  • A , so outcomes can work if you reverse-engineer vague criteria.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

54/100

Several students still earn As, but grading and missing work can feel arbitrary and stressful.

Online and chaos stories.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

64/100

Content is often called easy or manageable; the pain comes from organization, not concepts.

Online comments emphasize easy content with terrible delivery; .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

42/100

Attendance is marked mandatory in several sections and .

Online and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

and many urge students toward any other professor.

Online reviews are mostly avoid-level; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

, while others feel graded by few confusing items.

Format shift

Online tags include graded by few things; .

Workload

Moderate

48/100

; stress comes more from unclear or missing assignments than sheer volume.

Format shift

Online PHOTO10 often tags lots of homework; some sections omit work late in term.

Teaching experience

Poor

26/100

Dominant themes are unintelligible lectures, tangents, and no useful answers to questions.

Format shift

Online reviews are nearly all poor; in-person includes one excellent outlier.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Projects and weekly submissions dominate, with quizzes sometimes omitted and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

craft examples and several complaints about babbling, useless materials, and poor communication.

Main concern

Lectures and assignments often feel disconnected from the actual course subject.

What students said

“his lectures and written material have nothing to do with his assignments.”
ART80
“This man has the in my life.”
PHOT43
“Ninh Filip is an excellent instructor. He is helpful to students, and even flexible with those who make true effort.”
ART80

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online sections are heavily criticized for , and unintelligible lectures.

Main concern

Broken assignment timelines and .

What students said

“Week 6 was due before week 5. Non of agenda.”
PHOTO10
“Half the . Won't answer emails either despite promising he will.”
ART80
“I can barely understand what he's saying, and he goes on long tangents.”
PHOTO10

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; assessment risk comes from chaotic assignment rules instead.

Assignment HeavyMissing Due DatesUnclear InstructionsQuiz Sometimes Omitted

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and lectures more than formal exam policy and do not prove proctoring tools.

Project FocusUnclear Criteria
“Projects and lectures don't deal with the actual class subject”
PHOT43

Online

Online and omitted late-term work rather than webcam or Lockdown tools.

Missing Due DatesConfusing CanvasOmitted Final Work
“He then omitted the last quiz and any other work for the final.”
PHOTO10
“even if you attend every class, you will not get clear instructions on what the assignments are.”
ART80

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and stressful this class was.”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews, weighting repeated chaos and communication themes across online and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🌪️ Disorganization

26/100

“Week 6 was due before week 5. Non of agenda.”

🗣️ Communication Breakdown

26/100

“This man has the in my life.”

⚠️

28/100

“ .”

🎨 Rare Positive Outlier

70/100

“Great instructor, great class!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he goes on long tangents
  • babbles during lectures about God knows what
  • even simple questions turn into a long topic that has nothing to do with answering the question

Theme 2

💻 About Organization

  • there's no syllabus
  • Half the
  • Genuinely made

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • . Super accommodating.
  • Caring
  • flexible with those who make true effort

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Ten detailed reviews from 2020-2024 strongly agree on disorganization, with enough format split to compare online versus in person.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 57

Course coverage

ART804 reviews
PHOTO104 reviews
PHOT432 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 1 · A 4

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Rather not say 2