AI Rate Professor

Art

Christiana Updegraff

ART35 · ART31 · ART30 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if you can afford project costs, never miss class, and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderProject-heavy artHarsh on absencesGood feedback when engagedCostly materials
  • Recent students call her harsh, unresponsive, and uncaring about life issues.
  • and meaningful critique.
  • Expect , and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

and B-level outcomes show an A requires heavy effort and visual polish.

Both online and .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Difficulty ratings cluster high with multiple projects and strict standards for beginners.

Online and in-person both rate difficulty around 4-5.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

and missing class can tank the grade.

and participation pressure.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Recent quality scores and harsh-unhelpful stories outweigh a couple of strong online endorsements.

Online has both love and ; in-person lean negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Multiple tough-grader comments and claims of failing work that followed directions.

Format shift

and .

Workload

Heavy

32/100

and participation load.

Format shift

Online COVID terms cut projects from 4 to 3; load still felt substantial.

Teaching experience

Poor

40/100

and humor, but many say she does not teach live or answer emails.

Format shift

Online has clearer praise for critique; in-person has stronger uncaring and no-teaching complaints.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

, and group work rather than exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, and little live teaching or empathy.

Main concern

and failing students for personal absences.

What students said

“Awful professor. .”
ART30
“she grades too harshly, especially for a beginning jewelry class.”
ART35

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and high cost for others.

Main concern

Project expenses and inconsistent communication.

What students said

“This class would most likely make you spend a lot of money for the projects and the .”
ART30
“ as well as give meaningful critique and feedback”
ART30

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe project and critique assessment with .

Project-basedCritique-focusedNo exam evidence

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

80/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and attendance, not exam format.

Project gradingTough visual standards
“Even if you follow her directions, if it's not super visually appealing to her, then she'll fail you.”
ART35

Online

Online reviews and critique, not traditional exams.

Main projectsMeaningful critiqueClear grading criteria
“ as well as give meaningful critique and and after an assignment is done.”
ART30
“We had 4 projects originally but ran out of time and only did 3.”
ART31

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This class would most likely make you spend a lot of money for the projects and the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews (3 online, 3 in , and teaching. Credibility rating: Medium.

⚖️

22/100

“she grades too harshly, especially for a beginning jewelry class.”

💬

70/100

“ as well as give meaningful critique and feedback”

👎 Overall Risk

35/100

“Awful professor. .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • all she does is play pre recorded videos

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Grades to harshly
  • she'll fail you

Theme 3

💸 About Cost & Workload

  • spend a lot of money for the projects
  • Group projects
  • They were really fun! If you like hands on art making

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Six reviews with both formats and recent dates give usable signal, though opinions split by era.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ART304 reviews
ART311 review
ART351 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1