AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Ngo Ratanamuny

ALGEBRA110 · ALGEB110 · MATHMTH · STAT1 · MATH110 · PRECA1 · MATH140 · MATH130 · ELEMENTARYALGE · 48 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
11.11%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Avoid unless you are already strong in math and ready to teach yourself under a .

Best fit · Self Taught ProLots of homeworkTough graderSelf-teach requiredHigh drop ratePearson busywork
  • Massive Pearson and
  • and
  • Older algebra reviews were mixed-to-positive; recent STAT and math reviews are overwhelmingly negative

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

Students report zeros without warning, class averages near 15%, many drops, and almost no easy A path.

Online and and high failure; online is especially dropout-heavy.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

Even Elementary Stats is called anything but elementary; pace is fast and .

Both formats report high difficulty; online adds tech lag and no real teaching.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Many reviews mark attendance mandatory or say skipping means you will not pass; some older sections were looser.

; in-person often mandatory or strongly enforced.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

About 11% would take again; dominant recent message is stay away due to workload and lack of help.

Recent online ; a few older in-person algebra students still praise him.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

, and frequent progress-pressure to drop.

Format shift

Both formats report tough grading; .

Workload

Overwhelming

8/100

Weekly 50-100 multi-level questions plus quizzes, Cengage or Pearson chapters, and no working ahead.

Format shift

Online STAT reviews describe multi-hour Saturday and Sunday assignment stacks; in-person also heavy.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Many say he does not teach and sends students to Pearson; minority older .

Format shift

Online recent reviews are almost all poor; .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

and exams; homework often feels disconnected from tests.

Format shift

, and tests; online emphasizes Pearson volume.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

40 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

but recent reviews emphasize impossible homework loads, high failure, sarcasm, and self-teaching.

Main concern

Busywork overload and courses.

What students said

“The amount of busy work he assigns is blasphemous, 60 multiple level questions a week due every Saturday with no lenience what so ever.”
STAT1
“The highest score in the course was a 59% with the class average being a 15%.”
PRECA1
“Great algebra teacher. He is very thorough and wont move forward until everyones on the same page.”
MATH110

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students report crushing weekly multi-level homework, little teaching, tech lag, and .

Main concern

and weak instructor support.

What students said

“DO NOT ENROLL IN HIS CLASS!!! this professor is a disaster! does not care about students!”
STAT1
“Spend about 6 hours on assignments alone so no time to actually study or learn.”
STAT1
“He told the class that basically everyone was failing so to withdrawal while you still could.”
MATH130

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and ; some online or hybrid exams had tech submission failures.

Test heavyTimed quizzesNo curveHomework-quiz mismatchZoom exam submission issues

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; some Zoom-era tests required scanning submissions that failed.

No curveTest heavyZoom exam scanning issuesStudy guides vague or partial
“ phases, scanning in our tests and even when it says submitted sometimes it fails”
MATH130
“ .”
MATH130

Online

Online sections stress timed quizzes and ; little proctoring detail beyond tech lag.

Timed quiz every MondayQuizzes irrelevant to HWTest heavyPearson lessons
“ . Publishes weekly so no working ahead.”
STAT1
“Quizzes and .”
PRECA1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“DO NOT ENROLL IN HIS CLASS!!! this professor is a disaster! does not care about students!”

Voice snapshots generated from 48 reviews (8 online, 40 in-person), weighting recent STAT and and low support. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“does not help and does not teach anything! will tell you go learn from pearson!”

📚 Workload Intensity

8/100

“The amount of busy work he assigns is blasphemous, 60 multiple level questions a week due every Saturday with no lenience what so ever.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

15/100

“Will never recommend this instructor for anyone especially those who struggle in math.”

⚖️

18/100

“ ! Will give you a ZERO without batting an eye.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Be prepared to teach yourself!
  • he does well in explaining certain concepts well, but will not dive deeper
  • Great algebra teacher. He is very thorough

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The highest score in the course was a 59% with the class average being a 15%
  • If you care about
  • HW are super long.

Theme 3

💔 About Student Support

  • ask a question he mocks you off in front of the whole class
  • if the material doesn't click right away
  • Very sarcastic.!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

48

Recent reviews read by the AI

48

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

48 reviews across many years and courses with and support provide strong evidence despite some older praise.

Inside 48 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 55
3 out of 59
2 out of 54
1 out of 520

Course coverage

MATH11019 reviews
MATH13010 reviews
STAT18 reviews
PRECA14 reviews
MATH1402 reviews
Show 4 more courses
MATHMTH2 reviews
ALGEB1101 review
ALGEBRA1101 review
ELEMENTARYALGE1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

18 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

15

Audit/No Grade 1 · Drop/Withdrawal 7 · Not sure yet 6 · Not_Sure_Yet 1