AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Danny Tan

AMECH421 · AMECH430 · AMECH432 · AMECH · 25 lifetime ratings

AI rating
96/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
96.15%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

If you want automotive skills and a mentor who opens career doors, take every class you can with him.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerAutomotive Career MentorHands-On LearningInspirationalPatient with BeginnersIndustry Connected
  • Near-unanimous five-star praise for real-world auto knowledge and student care.
  • , and life lessons define the experience more than theory lectures.
  • Students credit him with job pathways, ASE success, and lifelong industry guidance.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Most reported grades are A-range if you show up, do hands-on work, and .

Almost ; the one online review reported B+.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Content is practical and he supports beginners, though hands-on volume and real standards still require effort.

In-person difficulty is moderate; online felt harder for the single reviewer.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Nearly and participation clearly matters.

In-person attendance is consistently required; the .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

Students repeatedly call him the and would take him again at an extremely high rate.

Recommendation is overwhelming in person; online sample is too small to change the picture.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Tough-grader tags appear, but actual grades and .

Format shift

A , but .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Hands-on projects, group work, papers, and .

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Students praise patience, real industry expertise, humor, and one-on-one help almost without dissent.

Format shift

Excellence is proven mainly in person; one online note still rates him highly.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Hands-on work and participation matter alongside midterms, finals, and .

Format shift

One detailed in-person note and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

26 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

mentor: hands-on, hilarious, caring, and career-connected.

Main concern

Attendance and participation matter, and some sections grade hard on hands-on standards.

What students said

“ alot.”
AMECH
“I am now ASE Master Tech certified after taking only 4 of this mans classes”
AMECH430
“He's the reason behind my success, he vouched for me and he will do the same for you.”
AMECH432
“this professor is the . and considerate of everyone.”
200

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

One online review still rates him highly and says he keeps pushing students to pass, while noting he can be hard to hear.

Main concern

Audio clarity may be weaker online than in the shop classroom.

What students said

“he's very silent and very hard to hear. But he's a good teacher he doesn't give up on us and he keeps pushing us until we pass”
200

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment mixes hands-on shop work with midterms and finals; .

Hands-on assessmentsMidterm and finalMultiple Canvas attemptsParticipation heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person classes emphasize hands-on work, with some Canvas midterms and .

Hands-on workCanvas midterm and finalThree attempts each
“for and the , but he gives three attempts each)”
200

Online

The single online review .

Extra credit mentioned
“he doesn't give up on us and he keeps pushing us until we pass”
200

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I will remember Professor Tan for the rest of my life. I aspire to be like him in the automotive field one day!”

Voice snapshots generated from 27 reviews, mostly in-person automotive classes, highlighting mentorship, hands-on learning, and near-universal praise. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“Professor Tan is one of the most amazing lecturers I have had. He goes above and beyond for his students.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

96/100

“ .”

🔧 Career Impact

95/100

“I am now ASE Master Tech certified after taking only 4 of this mans classes”

❤️ Care for Students

94/100

“even if you don't know anything about automotive, He will take his time for you to learned”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lots of hands on learning
  • amazing teacher
  • Always

Theme 2

🔧 About Career Mentorship

  • will help you get a job in the automotive field
  • he vouched for me
  • stays up to date with yearly auto industry training

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • very kind and considerate of everyone
  • Good sense of humor
  • inspirational guide to the youth

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

27

Recent reviews read by the AI

25

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-seven mostly consistent five-star reviews across many years and auto courses make the signal very strong.

Inside 27 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 526
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

20016 reviews
AMECH5 reviews
AMECH4303 reviews
AMECH4212 reviews
AMECH4321 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

26 reported outcomes

A range

19

A+ 5 · A 13 · A- 1

B range

4

B+ 2 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 2 · Not_Sure_Yet 1