AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Thomas Frost

PHILL11 · PHIL11 · PHIL6 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Skip unless you already thrive in lecture-heavy philosophy with .

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough graderUnfair gradingLecture heavyNot recommendedPolarizing
  • Three of four reviews rate quality 1 with .
  • and graded-by-few-things tags plus a D .
  • One positive outlier called the class straightforward and easy to grasp.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

24/100

Tough-grader tags, a D grade, and secure.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Difficulty ratings are mixed; one student found content easy while others rated .

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

and participation matters.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Take-again is about 25% with and quality-1 reviews.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

Tough grader tags, unfair-grader comments, and a .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Lecture-heavy and graded by few things, not a flood of assignments.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

24/100

Most students call the experience unfair or hilariously horrible despite one positive note.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Graded by few things and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and teaching, with only one brief positive note.

Main concern

Students report and .

What students said

“Professor Frost was not a .”
PHIL6
“hilariously horrible”
PHIL11
“ .”
PHIL6

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize tough, sparse .

Tough graderGraded by few thingsLecture heavy

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and few graded items without detailing open-book or proctoring.

Tough graderGraded by few things
“Professor Frost was not a .”
PHIL6
“ .”
PHIL6

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Frost was not a .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 and low recommendation. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

24/100

“hilariously horrible”

⚖️

15/100

“Professor Frost was not a .”

👎 Recommendation Rate

22/100

“ .”

✨ Rare Positive

70/100

“The class was very straight forward and easy to grasp!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • hilariously horrible
  • LECTURE HEAVY
  • The class was very straight forward and easy to grasp!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • not a
  • Graded by few things

Theme 3

🚫 About Recommendation

  • .
  • No

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Four in-person reviews from 2017-2024 mostly agree on avoid, but comments are short and sparse.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

PHIL62 reviews
PHIL111 review
PHILL111 review

Reported outcomes

D range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1