AI Rate Professor

Learning Skills

Antonya Jackson-Ruttlen

Courses not reported · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

Avoid this professor; both online and , and not worth taking.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderInsane workloadUnresponsiveConvoluted guidelinesWorst professor ever
  • Both reviews give quality 1 and difficulty 5 with C/D- grades.
  • Students report and .
  • Online workload is described as and lectures in too little time.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

8/100

Students earned C and and , so an A is not realistic.

Online emphasizes insane workload; in-person emphasizes unresponsiveness and convoluted guidelines.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

10/100

Both rate difficulty 5 with , and .

Both formats rate difficulty max; .

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

85/100

.

and in-person reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

and explicit do-not-take warnings from both students.

Both formats strongly advise against taking her courses.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

and D- grades show harsh, unforgiving evaluation.

Format shift

and in-person reviews.

Workload

Overwhelming

8/100

Lots of homework, so many papers, and insane lecture volume for short timelines.

Format shift

Workload complaints are strongest in the online review.

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

Students call her the , and unclear.

Format shift

Quality 1 in both formats with no positive teaching comments.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

and papers dominate; exams are not clearly described.

Format shift

Online review stresses homework and papers; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person 31100 students say she claims accessibility but , and guidelines are a guessing game.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“ but never really replied whenever I had questions.”
31100
“Her guidelines are convoluted and its a guessing game to understand what she wants you to do.”
31100

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online 31100 is slammed as the most tedious class in 14 years with and impossible timelines.

Main concern

Overwhelming homework plus lectures packed into short completion windows.

What students said

“This professor is the most tedious professor I have ever had in all my 14 years of education.”
31100
“ if you have literally anything else going on.”
31100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or proctoring policy.

Online

Online review .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is the . if you have literally anything else going on.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews across online and in-person 31100, highlighting workload, clarity, and accessibility. Credibility rating: Low.

💥 Teaching Quality

10/100

“She is the .”

📚 Workload Overload

8/100

“The sheer amount of homework and lectures you must do/take is INSANE for the short amount of time you get to complete them.”

🚫 Accessibility Gap

12/100

“ but never really replied whenever I had questions.”

Theme 1

📧 About Communication

  • never really replied whenever I had questions
  • its not like you can ask her to clarify
  • .

Theme 2

📝 About Workload & Clarity

  • guidelines are convoluted and its a guessing game
  • most tedious professor I have ever had
  • Lots of homework, So many papers

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only two recent reviews, consistent negatives, but tiny sample and .

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

311002 reviews

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

1

D- 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values