AI Rate Professor

Architecture

Victor Victor Lockett

ARCHT62 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
31/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

skilled students who can handle a harsh style may learn AutoCAD, but and temperament complaints.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarizing personalityAutoCAD skillsLate arrivals reportedLots of homeworkUnresponsive online
  • one calls him among the and chronic lateness.
  • Online student says he ignored emails and provided .
  • and workload is real, but an A is still possible if .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Students report A or B grades, but you work for them and online logistics can still cost a full grade.

In-person students earned As with effort; online student lost a letter grade over a .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

some call difficulty low, others 4/5, with fast lectures and heavy project work.

Online felt like lots of work with little teaching; .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

40/100

In-person attendance is important and sometimes mandatory, while the .

; in-person reviews stress attending lectures.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

33/100

Only one of ; serious conduct and communication failures outweigh one strong endorsement.

Positive recommendation is in-person only; online and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

Clear criteria help some, but ignored emails and others.

Format shift

Online grade logistics are the main fairness red flag.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Lots of homework and project work are repeatedly mentioned; you must work for the grade.

Format shift

Online explicitly tags lots of homework; .

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

One student thrives on AutoCAD mentoring, but lateness, cursing, ignored emails, and little teaching dominate the rest.

Format shift

In-person is polarized; online is clearly negative on teaching support.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

, and software work drive the .

Format shift

Both formats emphasize projects and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and allegations of lateness, cursing, and anger.

Main concern

Temperament and punctuality complaints are severe even though one student still recommends him.

What students said

“He'd show up to his class 30min to an hour late. Goes through material too quick. Would get mad at his students for not learning quick enough. Cursed at us.”
ARCHT62
“He is probably one of the . He shows you how to use AUTOCAD, as well as he touches a little on Revit and PhotoShop.”
ARCHT62

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

One online review reports lots of homework, little teaching, and a emails.

Main concern

Communication and grade.

What students said

“When doing the for us to submit to so I suffered from it and took a .”
ARCHT62

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize projects and software work; they do .

Project-based finalsHomework heavySoftware skills (AutoCAD)

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments focus on lectures and .

Project workLecture attendance matters
“he will have you work for your grade and because of his lectures.”
ARCHT62

Online

but the submission portal was missing according to the only online review.

Project finalSubmission portal issues
“When doing the for us to submit to so I suffered from it and took a .”
ARCHT62

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He'd show up to his class 30min to an hour late. Goes through material too quick. Would get mad at his students for not learning quick enough. Cursed at us.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews (1 online, 2 in person), capturing extreme polarization on temperament and reliability. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“He is probably one of the .”

⚠️ Reliability Issues

20/100

“I had emailed him multiple times about it and he ignored it.”

💻 Skill Payoff

70/100

“He shows you how to use AUTOCAD, as well as he touches a little on Revit and PhotoShop.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • doesn't do much teaching
  • He is a great help and will teach you so much
  • Goes through material too quick.

Theme 2

😡 About Classroom Climate

  • Cursed at us.
  • Guy seemed to have ego/anger issues
  • glad he was laid off.

Theme 3

📈 About Workload & Grades

  • It is a lot of work
  • he will have you work for your grade
  • took a .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

34/100

Evidence confidence

Only 3 reviews with extreme contradiction and sparse recent detail, so reliability is limited.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ARCHT623 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values