AI Rate Professor

Counseling

Arnette Edwards

AFRS11911 · COUNS1 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

Skip if you need structure and ; only consider if you can self-manage a .

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganizedParticipation mattersSlow gradingLaid back (older reviews)Tough on feedback
  • Recent online , and poor communication.
  • Workload and essays, but marks feel arbitrary to some.
  • Older in-person COUNS1 reviews split between laid-back easy fun and boring kindergarten-like.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

One recent review calls it an easy A with light weekly work, but others report unexplained mark-downs that make As uncertain.

Online mixed ; .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

65/100

Average difficulty is moderate-low; , and short essays rather than hard theory.

and ; older in-person was described as easy but boring.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Recent online reviews mark attendance mandatory with cold calls when participation is low.

; older in-person did not clearly document policy.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Only about 25% would take again and modern comments stress disorganization over teaching strengths.

Recent online reviews drive the ; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

and unexplained mark-downs outweigh the one easy-A report.

Format shift

Online reviews are the strict source; .

Workload

Light

70/100

, and two short essays keep volume manageable.

Format shift

Online AFRS describes light weekly writing; older in-person had little work.

Teaching experience

Average

42/100

Passion and kindness appear, but disorganization, boring lectures, and ignored emails drag quality down.

Format shift

Online leans poor-to-average; .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Discussions, journals, essays, and a ; .

Format shift

Online is assignment-heavy; and little else.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Very old in-person COUNS1 comments call her laid back and easy or boring and kindergarten-like.

Main concern

Thin outdated sample; lecture quality mixed.

What students said

“She is very laid back! ... ! Not much other work.”
COUNS1
“BORING..if ..find someone else.”
COUNS1

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online AFRS and COUNS sections mix easy-A potential with , and unanswered emails; .

Main concern

Disorganization, harsh unexplained mark-downs, and weak responsiveness.

What students said

“Will constantly mark and .”
COUNS1
“ and tends to blame the students for "not listening" when an issue is due to her own mistakes.”
AFRS119-11

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Recent online finals are slide-based definitions; software.

Group project midtermEssay exams componentsFinal definitions from slidesEasy tests (older)

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Older in-person notes easy tests with little other work; .

Easy tests
“ ! Not much other work.”
COUNS1

Online

group midterm, two 5-page essays with as definitions and examples from slides.

Group project midtermTwo essaysSlide-based final
“The midterm was a group project and there were two 5 pg essays, make sure you cite EVERYTHING. .”
AFRS119-11

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Disorganized and will . Emailed her multiple times asking for help or why I was getting marked down on assignments and was never answered.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting organization and mixed ease. Credibility rating: Low.

⚠️ Organization Issues

30/100

“the only problem is that ”

📉 Recommendation Rate

28/100

“23/30 students dropped.”

📝 Workload Reality

70/100

“hw was only weekly discussions (5 sentences) and journal entries (1 pg).”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Edwards is passionate about her topic and
  • She isn't that great at lecturing
  • BORING..if ..find someone else

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Overall, the class was an easy A and fulfills reqs
  • Will constantly mark and
  • ! Not much other work

Theme 3

⚠️ About Course Ops

  • She takes a long time to grade, but
  • Clearly doesn't reread or

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

40/100

Evidence confidence

Only six reviews, two from 2009–2010, with mixed and conflicting modern online experiences.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

AFRS119-113 reviews
COUNS13 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1