AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Jina Shin

VN230 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
20%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Avoid if you need fair clinical support and ; only manageable if and push through.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough graderPlays favoritesCondescendingConfusing testsClinical early leave
  • Four of five recent reviews are negative on fairness, lectures, and tests.
  • Students repeatedly report favoritism in class and .
  • One older glowing review conflicts with the dominant recent experience.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Tough grader tags, B and C grades, and rather than a free grade.

All evidence is from in-person VN230 reviews; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Difficulty sits around average nursing load but content and and students still must teach themselves a lot.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

as and clinical.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Official take-again is only 20% and most comments warn others off due to favoritism and poor teaching.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Repeated tough grader tags, not lenient at all, and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Group projects and lecture-heavy structure with graded-by-few-things pressure, not described as .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Most students call lectures boring or dry, clinical short and unfair, and the instructor condescending rather than helpful.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

and graded by few things, with group projects also noted.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person VN230 is widely seen as dry, unfair, and hard to learn from, with favoritism and .

Main concern

Favoritism, condescending tone, and .

What students said

“She's condescending and boring during lecture. .”
VN230
“She plays favorites and it is obvious to the rest of the class.”
VN230
“Just do the work and push through. One of .”
VN230

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests are repeatedly called nonsensical and not lenient, with .

Confusing test questionsNot lenientTough grader

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Students say and she is not lenient at all.

Confusing testsTough graderNot lenient
“ .”
VN230
“ and she is not lenient at all.”
VN230

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Just do the work and push through. One of .”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person nursing , and low recommendation. Credibility rating: Medium.

⚠️ Teaching Quality

28/100

“I honestly don't know why she teaches. It doesn't seem like she wants to be in class.”

👎 Low Recommendation

22/100

“One of .”

⚖️ Favoritism Risk

25/100

“She plays favorites and it is obvious to the rest of the class since she will praise and be more lenient with her favorites.”

📝

30/100

“ and she is not lenient at all.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • condescending and boring during lecture
  • Super dry and plays favorites
  • by-the-book and expects students to figure a lot out independently

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • not lenient at all

Theme 3

🏥 About Clinical

  • we always left earlier than all the other cohorts
  • Super obvious in clinical as well
  • If you're her fave but unprepared she helps

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Five mostly recent detailed reviews with a , though one older 5-star review reduces full consistency.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 50

Course coverage

VN2305 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

3

B 2 · B- 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values