AI Rate Professor

Trades & Technology

Brian Mayeda

Courses not reported · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
88/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Great pick for beginners in auto trades who want a patient, experienced, and approachable instructor.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyNewbie friendlyIndustry experienceFunny and respectedAnswers all questionsParticipation matters
  • Single 5-star review with full would-take-again for AUTO 201-203.
  • Praised as knowledgeable, funny, and especially newbie-friendly.
  • Uses real shop experience and catchphrases to keep learning practical.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

Student earned an A at difficulty 2 with participation mattering, suggesting a fair path rather than a free A.

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

Rated difficulty 2 and described as newbie friendly with .

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

as mandatory and participation matters.

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

95/100

The only review is a clear 10/10 recommend with .

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

70/100

Student received an A and felt supported; .

Format shift

Evidence .

Workload

Moderate

60/100

; focus is hands-on auto classes with participation.

Format shift

Evidence .

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

Described as very knowledgeable, respected, funny, and fully willing to answer every beginner question.

Format shift

Evidence .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews emphasize participation and practical .

Format shift

Evidence .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

One in-person trades student found Mayeda knowledgeable, funny, and .

Main concern

Only one review so results may not generalize.

What students said

“He also is "Newbie" friendly, I had a lot of questions and he answered them all. 10/10 recommend.”
201

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; success is tied to participation and asking questions in class.

Participation focused

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews do not clearly prove a ; participation and practical learning are the focus.

Participation matters
“Professor Mayeda, in the AUTO classes of 201, 202, and 203 was very knowledgeable, respected, and funny.”
201

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He also is "Newbie" friendly, I had a lot of questions and he answered them all. 10/10 recommend.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review, highlighting beginner support and industry experience. Credibility rating: Low.

🌟 Teaching Quality

92/100

“Professor Mayeda, in the AUTO classes of 201, 202, and 203 was very knowledgeable, respected, and funny.”

👍

95/100

“He also is "Newbie" friendly, I had a lot of questions and he answered them all. 10/10 recommend.”

🛠️ Real Experience

90/100

“He would relate his years of experiences in his class by saying "Ask me how I know" or "Trust but verify."”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • very knowledgeable, respected, and funny
  • relate his years of experiences
  • Newbie friendly

Theme 2

❤️ About Support

  • I had a lot of questions and he answered them all
  • 10/10 recommend

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only one detailed positive review from 2023, so scores are directionally useful but not highly reliable.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

2011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values