AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Edward Kim

MATHMATH · STATS1 · MATH37 · MATH120 · STAT1 · MATH110 · MATH130 · MATH50 · MATH45 · 26 lifetime ratings

AI rating
72/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

Great choice for traditional in-person algebra or stats if you do the homework; harsh 2020 feedback.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyClear step-by-step lecturesNotes allowed on testsHilarious and relatableHomework must doUnorganized online stats
  • Long history of and patient explanations
  • 2020 online Stats reviews are harshly negative on organization and reliability
  • notes, and

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Many report , and strong grades if .

and easy-if-you-try policies; online Stats felt much harder and unfair.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Lower-level algebra and stats feel manageable because he breaks concepts down step by step.

; online Stats was labeled not easy and poorly supported.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

and success, with mixed mandatory flags and some enforcement of lateness rules.

Limited explicit online attendance detail; .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

Historical in-person praise is extremely strong, but the and toxic online Stats reviews pull the recommendation down.

; both online Stats reviews say do not take him.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Notes on quizzes/tests, partial credit, and .

Format shift

In-person leniency is well documented; online reviews call him a .

Workload

Light

62/100

and checked but generally described as manageable and aligned with exams.

Format shift

Online Stats reported heavy Connect Math workload; but easy.

Teaching experience

Good

80/100

Years of glowing in-person clarity and humor are offset by severe 2020 online disorganization complaints.

Format shift

In-person excellence dominates the sample; online quality is rated very poorly.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Mix of checked homework, quizzes, practice exams, and tests; .

Format shift

and exams; online leaned on Connect Math and test-heavy structure.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

24 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students across many years call him one of the , and notes-on-tests policies.

Main concern

and pace can be quick; a few note he can be strict about rules.

What students said

“ ! SO WELL”
MATH130
“HE LETS AND TESTS”
MATH130
“Terrible, NOT EASY, not honest, keeps changing the rules of the game”
STATS1

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Both 2020 online , and unhelpful with poor lecture quality.

Main concern

Rule changes, no study guides, bad camera quality, and reliance on Connect Math instead of teaching.

What students said

“ times, NO STUDY GUIDES, bad quality camera used for lectures”
STATS1
“ , and contradicts himself”
STAT1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and mirror practice problems, which is highly student-friendly.

Notes allowed on testsTake-home finalPractice examsHomework-based exam questions

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person tests frequently allow notes or and practice exams reported.

Notes on quizzes and testsTake-home finalHomework usable on examsPractice exams
“HE LETS AND TESTS”
MATH130
“ ... The ”
STATS1

Online

Online Stats reviews do not describe open-book or notes policies and instead criticize lack of study guides and .

No study guidesChanging exam chaptersTest heavy
“NO STUDY GUIDES”
STATS1
“He would mention an and later changed the chapters”
STAT1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ! SO WELL FOR THE FIRST TIME IN MY LIFE I UNDERSTOOD MATH!!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 26 reviews, contrasting long-run in-person praise with severe 2020 online Stats complaints. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

80/100

“for the first time in my life I UNDERSTOOD MATH!!! . KIM”

📝

78/100

“HE LETS AND TESTS. ”

⚠️ Online Warning

20/100

“ times... !”

👍 Historical Recommendation

42/100

“If you don't understand something, he is always will to .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • super funny
  • so well
  • relates math to real life stories

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • pretty easy class if you attend
  • lets you use notes on the tests
  • NOT EASY, not honest
  • earned an A! !!

Theme 3

💻 About Online Experience

  • bad quality camera used for lectures
  • Mathconnect becomes your teacher
  • contradicts himself
  • keeps changing the rules

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

26

Recent reviews read by the AI

26

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

26 reviews give solid sample size, but most praise is from 2007-2012 while the few recent online reviews sharply conflict.

Inside 26 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 519
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATH1308 reviews
STAT14 reviews
STATS14 reviews
MATH1203 reviews
MATH1102 reviews
Show 4 more courses
MATH372 reviews
MATH451 review
MATH501 review
MATHMATH1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values