AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Rhonda Alger

VN220VN220L · VN235 · VN200 · VN220 · TRANSITION · NURSN · VN225 · TRANTRAN · 24 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
62.5%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you will attend, do the , and follow clinical rules strictly; avoid if you need a soft clinical evaluator.

Best fit · Effort For RewardLots of homeworkCaring but strictLecture heavyClinical favoritism concernsApproachable with stories
  • , and strong at preparing nurses, especially for dosage math.
  • Workload is heavy with essays, weekly quizzes, and busywork; .
  • A minority report bias, favoritism in clinical, and harsh marginals over small rule violations.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Assignments and quizzes are doable if completed, but and strict clinical rules make a high grade require steady effort.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Content is often described as straightforward with stories and , though dosage math and clinical skills still demand practice.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

and students say skipping means you will not pass.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

63/100

About three in offset by serious clinical-bias complaints.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

Some call assignments easy and , while and harsh clinical marginals.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students consistently report lots of , and busywork.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

Many describe her as , and passionate; a minority say she is late, biased, or unsupportive in clinical.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Grade mix includes weekly quizzes, essays, a high-stakes math test, participation, and clinical evaluation.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

24 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person nursing and clinical courses with , and ; many praise her passion while a vocal minority report bias and stress in clinical.

Main concern

Clinical strictness, favoritism claims, and lots of busywork.

What students said

“Her class does require a lot of work but I felt that they all helped you prepare for nursing.”
VN220
“she made my academic progress stressful.”
VN220VN220L
“This professor was the best! She helped me a lot and support me throughout the way.”
NURSN

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and a critical dosage-calculation math test rather than exotic proctoring.

Weekly quizzesImportant math dosage testLecture and test based TuesdaysHomework-heavy prep

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a very important math dosage test.

Weekly quizzesMath dosage testEssays and presentations
“Lots of essays, a quiz every week, 1 presentation and a handful of hw assignments and 1 VERY important math test.”
VN220
“Prepare to only have tests every Tuesday the class ”
VN220

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Alger was awesome. Her class does require a lot of work but I felt that they all helped you prepare for nursing.”

Voice snapshots generated from 24 in-person reviews spanning many years, highlighting teaching care, heavy workload, and clinical fairness. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

70/100

“Rhonda is awesome! Very good teacher. Her classes are the .”

📚 Heavy Workload

28/100

“Lots of homework. Lots of busy work.”

⚠️ Clinical Fairness Concerns

40/100

“she was spiteful a witch bias I was told fluids and electrolytes is a hard class to pass”

❤️ Caring Support

75/100

“ and makes sure everyone understands before moving on”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Loved how she told stories about her experience as a nurse and related it to her teaching.
  • She is the and helpful.
  • She has a lot of nursing stories that she tells

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Really easy class if you do the work.
  • Lots of homework, but it's good training for a nursing student.
  • Study for math for meds!

Theme 3

⚠️ About Clinical and Fairness

  • the favoritism towards certain people
  • Comes late everyday, puts her foot in her mouth constantly, and does not know nursing.
  • Seemed to be easily swayed by weaker students that kissed butt for a good clinical review.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

24

Recent reviews read by the AI

24

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-four in-person reviews span 2006-2023 with detailed comments and mixed but recurring themes.

Inside 24 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 515
4 out of 53
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

VN22012 reviews
VN220VN220L3 reviews
VN2353 reviews
NURSN2 reviews
TRANSITION1 review
Show 3 more courses
TRANTRAN1 review
VN2001 review
VN2251 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 2 · A 1

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 3

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1