AI Rate Professor

English

Mick Haven

ENG1 · ENG30947 · ENGIL0000 · ENGL3 · ENG111 · ENG12344 · ENGL105 · ENGLI7045 · ENGLISH3 · ENG3 · ENG105 · ENGLI1254 · ENGENG · ENG801A · 44 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
30.77%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Avoid unless you already write well and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPolarizingTough GraderGroup HeavyUnorganizedMilitary Themes
  • older fans love energy, recent students call him unhelpful.
  • Tough essay grading with little writing instruction frustrates weaker writers.
  • , and disorganization are recurring complaints.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Tough essay standards and weak writing instruction make an A hard unless you already write strongly.

; online has an especially negative tough-grader review.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

, and high expectations keep content demanding.

and military-themed papers.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

Some and cold-calling; others say missing is fine if work is done.

In-person evidence conflicts; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

31/100

Would-take-again sits near 31% with many recent students warning others away.

Online is split one-to-one; the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Repeated tough-grader tags and .

Format shift

Online and .

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Three books, multiple essays, group projects, and .

Format shift

and essay volume.

Teaching experience

Average

46/100

Passionate and funny for and unhelpful for many others, especially recently.

Format shift

Older in-person praise is strong; newer in-person and one online review are scathing.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

Essays, revisions, group projects, and discussion dominate over traditional exams.

Format shift

Both formats center essays; in-person adds frequent group work.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

42 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews swing from best-teacher-ever praise to worst-professor complaints about disorganization, group work, and .

Main concern

, and mandatory participation or group work.

What students said

“WASTE OF TIME! Completely unqualified... Doesn't Teach!”
ENG105
“He grades heavily and is very nit picky. Follow his rules and you'll do fine.”
ENGL3
“he does not teach how to write. his lessons only consist of talking about the prompt”
ENG1

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

one harsh no-teach critique and one positive for energy and group work.

Main concern

.

What students said

“Haven doesnt actually teach he just gives you essays that are so .”
ENG3
“He is a smart professor, passionate, hilarious, and he involves everyone”
ENG30947

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; little evidence of proctored multiple-choice exams.

Essay HeavyIn-Class Essay FinalSources RequiredRevision Options Sometimes

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person classes emphasize essays, required sources, discussions, and occasional in-class finals.

Essays with SourcesIn-Class Essay FinalGroup Discussions
“ . He grades heavily and is very nit picky.”
ENGL3
“3 BOOKS TO READ,3 PAPERS DUE, AND AN IN .”
ENG3

Online

Online evidence focuses on high-stakes essays and .

Essay HeavyHarsh Criticism
“He grades harsh but doesnt teach. He grades with harsh criticism but doesnt help to make you better for the next time.”
ENG3

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you're not .”

Voice snapshots generated from 44 reviews with strong polarization between older praise and newer criticism. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

46/100

“Very knowledgable dude but can't really teach well..”

⚖️

28/100

“He grades heavily and is very nit picky. Follow his rules and you'll do fine.”

👎 Recommendation Risk

31/100

“ . he does not teach how to write.”

📚 Workload

30/100

“ if you have other classes or work.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • passionate, hilarious
  • Doesn't Teach
  • unorganized
  • full of energy, passion, and humor

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • IF YOU

Theme 3

👥 About Class Format

  • 80% of class is Group while he sits on computer
  • Expect to interact with the whole class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

44

Recent reviews read by the AI

44

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Forty-four reviews across many years with rich detail and .

Inside 44 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 522
4 out of 56
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 513

Course coverage

ENG315 reviews
ENG10510 reviews
ENGL36 reviews
ENG13 reviews
ENG1111 review
Show 9 more courses
ENG123441 review
ENG309471 review
ENG801A1 review
ENGENG1 review
ENGIL00001 review
ENGL1051 review
ENGLI12541 review
ENGLI70451 review
ENGLISH31 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 1 · A 4

B range

2

B 2

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2