AI Rate Professor

Humanities

Gene Grey

PHIL10 · PHIL6 · PHIL12 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
36/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
40%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

High risk of chaos and demeaning tone; only consider if you can self-manage and luck into a lighter online section.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarizingDisorganizedCondescendingEasy A for someMessy communication
  • Reviews and students who call him a .
  • Multiple students cite erratic emails, rigid tone, and disorganized course structure.
  • Some online sections felt like an easy A with group true-false tests and light discussions.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

76/100

Several students report As with few , and teach-to-the-test lectures if you keep up.

Online reviews more often describe easy group tests and easy A; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

some find it broken down like a game, others call difficulty high with .

Online comments span easy and hard; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Most reviews mark attendance mandatory, with only one PHIL6 note that it was not.

Evidence is mostly mandatory across formats; only one .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Take-again is about 40% and several detailed reviews urge avoiding him for mess, condescension, and disorganization.

Online is split yes/no; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Graded by few things, group true-false tests, and multiple A/A+ grades appear despite low quality ratings.

Format shift

Leniency shows more clearly in online grade outcomes than in in-person withdrawal stories.

Workload

Light

62/100

and limited graded items appear for some sections, though .

Format shift

Online mentions few graded items; in-person complaints are about .

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Two glowing reviews exist, but more students describe outdated lectures, condescension, and unprofessional class management.

Format shift

Online is polarized; in-person reviews are consistently poor.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Tests and or other graded pieces.

Format shift

Online highlights group true-false tests; and missing class notes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, and students who withdrew or .

Main concern

Disorganization, frustration at students, and lack of real teaching presence.

What students said

“I really regret signing up for this class. I have taken several online classes before but this one was a ”
PHIL12
“ and off-putting.”
PHIL10

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

one easy group-test experience and review for outdated style and tech failures.

Main concern

Condescending messaging, tech blackouts, and outdated lectures can ruin the experience.

What students said

“ as a group which contained 20 questions for three hours and they were only true or false.”
PHIL6
“AVOID. Per provided video lectures, hasn't changed teaching style in >8yrs.”
PHIL12
“This class is a easy A but you must keep up on the lectures.”
PHIL12

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams range from collaborative true-false group tests online to more conventional .

Group testsTrue or falseFew graded itemsTest heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and poorly supported with notes, but do not detail proctoring tools.

Test heavyNo class visuals or notes
“Did not have any visuals or notes for the class to copy (he said it was all on youtube).”
PHIL10

Online

One online section used collaborative true-false tests with long time windows; another stressed keeping up with lectures for tests.

Group true-false testsLong time windowTeach to the test
“ as a group which contained 20 questions for three hours and they were only true or false.”
PHIL6
“ because he only teaches you what you need to know for the .”
PHIL12

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“AVOID. Per provided video lectures, hasn't changed teaching style in >8yrs. Rigid mentality. Condescending & demeaning to students, in person & virtually.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews spanning online and and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

⚠️ Teaching Quality

38/100

“came off very unprofessional. and off-putting.”

🎯 Easy Grade Path

76/100

“This class is a easy A but you must keep up on the lectures.”

👎 Recommendation Risk

35/100

“ .”

Theme 1

🌪️ About Organization

  • this one was a
  • went dark for ~2wks; cited "technical difficulties"
  • class and off-putting.

Theme 2

📈

  • as a group
  • This class is a easy A but you must keep up on the lectures.
  • Graded by few things

Theme 3

😤 About Tone

  • Condescending & demeaning to students
  • He seemed to get frustrated when the class did not understand the material.
  • Weird expectations and no .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Five detailed reviews from 2016-2022 with ; sample is small and polarized, so confidence is moderate.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

PHIL123 reviews
PHIL101 review
PHIL61 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1