AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Shannon Macias

ACCT1 · ACCTG1A · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
84/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you want a supportive accounting professor and can handle a .

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring and helpfulFast-paced workloadClear grading criteriaInteractive Zoom supportAssignment-heavy weeks
  • , and strong for first accounting.
  • Workload can be heavy and fast-paced, especially in summer online sections.
  • Asynchronous format drew one complaint about content gaps and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Students earn As with consistent work, but .

Online and in-person both report As with effort; no pure easy-A claims.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

First accounting is doable with her help, yet summer pacing and weekly chapters raise the intellectual load.

Online summer felt rushed; live Zoom section felt more guided.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

as mandatory while one async student said it was not.

Live or Zoom sections expect presence; async online was more flexible.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

Three of and ; one async student would not.

Strong yes from most online and Zoom reviews; one async online no.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

70/100

and solid A outcomes for students who keep up with work.

Format shift

Consistent across formats with limited grade conflict.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Multiple assignments per week, especially summer online, make the pace demanding.

Format shift

Online summer reports about six weekly assignments; live Zoom did more work in class.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Students highlight care, clear criteria, and interactive help, with one async critique of content gaps.

Format shift

Live and guided online praised more than pure async.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Weekly chapter assignments dominate learning; .

Format shift

Online comments emphasize assignment volume over exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

One Zoom-labeled in-person report calls her interactive, supportive, and focused on understanding during class.

Main concern

Participation is expected during live meetings.

What students said

“She was amazing. Very interactive during the class and wanted to make sure you understood the assignments.”
ACCTG1A

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students mostly praise her care and learning payoff, but , and slower email in async format.

Main concern

and limited office-hour fit for full-time workers.

What students said

“She is an amazing professor and truly cares about you and will go out of her way to help you.”
ACCTG1A
“About 6 assignments due every week”
ACCTG1A
“emailing her wasn't sufficient as it took her +3 days to respond.”
ACCT1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews focus on weekly assignments more than exam logistics; .

Assignment-driven courseTesting mentioned without proctoring details

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; exam policy not clearly described.

In-class work and Q and A
“We did a lot of the work while in class and always stayed in the meeting afterwards to answer any questions.”
ACCTG1A

Online

Online reviews mention testing and assignments but .

Weekly assignmentsTesting with content gaps noted
“there seemed to be gaps in a few areas that I found while testing and while .”
ACCT1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is an amazing professor and truly cares about you and will go out of her way to help you.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews (3 online, 1 in person), highlighting care, pace, and async friction. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“She was amazing. Very interactive during the class and wanted to make sure you understood the assignments.”

⏱️ Workload Reality

35/100

“About 6 assignments due every week (3 for each chapter I think).”

👍 Recommendation Rate

78/100

“ if you like a class that gets straight to the point.”

❤️ Caring Support

88/100

“She is an amazing professor and truly cares about you and will go out of her way to help you.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • truly cares about you and will go out of her way to help you
  • Very interactive during the class
  • her lecture videos were pretty detailed

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • About 6 assignments due every week
  • Even though I felt a little rushed, It helped me learn a lot.
  • gaps in a few areas that I found while testing

Theme 3

💬 About Communication

  • always stayed in the meeting afterwards to answer any questions
  • emailing her wasn't sufficient as it took her +3 days to respond.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Four recent reviews with good detail and mostly consistent praise, but small sample and one format split lower certainty.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ACCTG1A3 reviews
ACCT11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values